摘要
德国古典哲学的代表人物谢林与黑格尔对笛卡尔做出了相互联系但并不相同的解读,这归因于两人各自哲学体系的联系与差异。他们都将笛卡尔的我思视作近代哲学的革命性开端,但却对笛卡尔所遗留的自我意识统一性、神与主客体的统一性、自然与精神的撕裂等问题做出了不同的克服与超越。本文通过梳理谢林《近代哲学史》与黑格尔《哲学史讲演录》中对笛卡尔的不同解读,归纳出他们对笛卡尔的肯定与多角度批评,在此基础上揭示出他们的笛卡尔解释与各自哲学立场的内在关系。
Schelling and Hegel made different but interrelated interpretations on Descartes,which are due to their different philosophy systems.They both took Cogito as the very beginning of modern philosophy,but made different efforts to overcome the difficulties left in Descartes9s first philosophy,such as the unity of self-consciousness,God and the unity of subject-object,and the separation of spirit and nature.This article aims at analyzing their different treatments of Descartes in Zur Geschichte der Neueren Philosophic and Vorlesungen ilber die Geschichte der Philosophie,then clarifies their different positions concerning Descartes's legacy.Finally,the relationship between their interpretations and their own philosophy will be revealed.
作者
雷思温
Lei Siwen(Lecturer of Foreign Philosophy Section,Department of Philosophy,Renmin University of China,100871)
出处
《哲学评论》
CSSCI
2017年第2期31-51,共21页
Wuda Philosophical Review
基金
2016年度中国人民大学科学研究基金面上项目“笛卡尔与古典中世纪哲学”的资助,项目批准号为16XNB039。
关键词
我思
本体论证明
自然
Cogito
ontological proof
spirit
nature
