期刊文献+

基于微信平台中期照护对食管癌患者自我管理效能及生活质量的影响 被引量:6

Effect of the intermediate care model based on WeChat platform on self-management efficacy and quality of life(QOL)of patients with esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基于微信平台中期照护对食管癌患者自我管理效能及生活质量的影响。方法:选取医院收治的60例食管癌患者,采用随机数表法将其分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用中期照护,患者出院时和出院后3个月采用癌症自我管理效能量表(SUPPH)和生活质量核心问卷(QLQ-C30)进行调查,比较两组自我管理效能及生活质量。结果:两组出院时自我效能和生活质量相似。出院后3个月观察组自我效能的正性态度、自我决策、自我减压和总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=4.260,t=8.078,t=12.553,t=6.919;P<0.05);观察组生活质量总体健康状况、躯体功能、情感功能、社会功能和角色功能评分好于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.120,t=1.821,t=1.981,t=2.064,t=2.180;P<0.05),疲劳、疼痛、呼吸困难及失眠好于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=-3.251,t=-2.963,t=-2.582,t=-2.685;P<0.05)。结论:基于微信平台中期照护可明显改善患者自我管理效能,提高患者生活质量。 Objective:To explore the effect of the intermediate care model based on WeChat platform on selfmanagement efficacy and quality of life(QOL)of patients with esophageal cancer.Methods:60 patients with esophageal cancer admitted to the hospital were selected and divided into observation group and control group by random number table method,with 30 cases in each group.The control group adopted routine care,and the observation group adopted intermediate care.The self-management efficacy and quality of life of the patients were compared using the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health(SUPPH)and Quality of Life-Core 30 Questionnaire(QLQ-C30)at and within 3 months after discharge.Results:Self-efficacy and quality of life at discharge were similar in both groups.The positive attitude,self-decision,self-decompression and total scores of self-efficacy of the observation group were higher than those of the control group 3 months after discharge,and the difference was statistically significant(t=4.260,t=8.078,t=12.553,t=6.919;P<0.05);the overall health,physical function,emotional function,social function and role function scores of the observation group's quality of life were better than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(t=2.120,t=1.821,t=1.981,t=2.064,t=2.180;P<0.05),fatigue,pain,dyspnea and insomnia were better than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(t=-3.251,t=-2.963,t=-2.582,t=-2.685;P<0.05).Conclusion:Intermediate care model based on WeChat platform can significantly improve self-management efficacy and quality of life of patients.
作者 邓雪 许莹莹 黄婧 徐静 仝宇梭 朱卫国 DENG Xue;XU Ying-ying;HUANG Jing(Department of Radiotherapy Oncology,The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Huai’an 223300,China;不详)
出处 《中国医学装备》 2021年第5期163-166,共4页 China Medical Equipment
基金 国家自然科学基金(81602118)“pou3f3促进食管鳞癌细胞增殖和侵袭的分子机制” 淮安市自然科学研究计划(HAB201930)“肿瘤相关成纤维细胞通过外泌体介导IncRNA HNFIA-ASI转运促进食管鳞癌化疗抵抗机制研究”。
关键词 食管癌 微信 中期照护 自我管理效能 生活质量 Esophageal cancer WeChat platform Intermediate care Self-management efficacy Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献69

  • 1陈亮恭 黄信彰.中期照护:架构老年健康服务的关键[J].台湾老年医学杂志,2007,3(1):1-11. 被引量:3
  • 2Department of Health. Shaping planning for hospitals and related the future NHS: long-term services-consultation document on the findings of the National Beds Inquiry-supporting analysis. (2000) [ 2012-08-09 ]. http://www, dh. gov. uk/en/ Publi lications/Publications Policy And. 被引量:1
  • 3吴冠颖,吴肖琪,洪燕妮,等.台湾脑中风病人急性医疗后期照护需要之探讨.台湾卫志,2012,31(3):251-262. 被引量:1
  • 4Melis RJF. What is intermediate care? An international consensus on what constitutes intermediate care is needed. BMJ, 2004, 329 (7462) :360-365. 被引量:1
  • 5Steiner A. Intermediate care: A conceptual framework and reviewof the literature. London: King' s Fund,1997:83. 被引量:1
  • 6李欣慈,曾建宁,胡文郁.台湾护理之家提供急性医疗后期的挑战.长期照护杂志,2011,15(3):249-258. 被引量:1
  • 7Vaughan B. United Kingdom: Caring differently: Intermediate care-An alternative approach to service provision in response to client need and workforce changes in the NHS. Int J Nurs Pmct, 1998,4( 1 ) :62-67. 被引量:1
  • 8Parker G, Bhakta P, Paisley S, et al. Best place of care for older people after acute and during subacute illness. Health Serv Res Policy ,2000,5 ( l ) :76-89. 被引量:1
  • 9Department of Health. Intermediate care. Retrieved December 20,2009. [ R/OL]. ( 2001 ) [ 2012-08-03 ]. http ://www. dh. gov. uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/ rculars/DH-4(X)3qM. 被引量:1
  • 10Junker C, Zimmerman JE, Alzola C. A multicenter description of intermediate-care patients: comparison with ICU low-risk monitor patients. Chest,2002,121 (12) :53-61. 被引量:1

共引文献501

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部