摘要
“抑制适用模式”和“提倡适用模式”是认罪认罚量刑情节适用的两种模式。这两种模式基于不同的价值立场,分别从客观、主观及载体三方面对“认罪”“认罚”的含义进行阐述,但忽视了刑事一体化视角下内涵界定的统筹协调。从均衡制度适用的视角出发,“认罪”情节应具备客观折中性、主观悔罪性与载体交叉性的特征,“认罚”情节应富含客观折中性、主观理性与载体独立性的特点,且两情节间应保持适用的“半”同步与效力的“半”刚性。
“Suppression applicable mode”and“advocation applicable mode”are the two modes of the sentencing circumstances of Chinese plea bargaining.The two modes which are based on different value standpoint expound the meaning of“admission of guilty”and“acceptance of punishment”,but they neglect the overall coordination of connotation definition under the perspective of criminal integration.Therefore,from the perspective of balancing the application of the system,the sentencing circumstances of“admission of guilty”should have the basic characteristics of objective neutrality,subjective contrition and carrier intersectionality;the sentencing circumstances of“acceptance of punishment”have the essential characteristics of objective neutrality,subjective rationality and carrier independence;and the sentencing circumstances of“admission of guilty”and“acceptance of punishment”should adhere to the“semi-synchronous”application and“semi-rigid”effectiveness.
作者
刘茵琪
Liu Yinqi(School of Law,Changchun University of Science and Technology,Changchun,Jilin 130022)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2021年第3期123-131,共9页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目“认罪认罚从宽制度的程序理论研究”(项目编号:17AFX015)
吉林大学廉政建设专项研究课题一般项目“监察机关境外追逃追赃研究”(项目编号:2019LZY011)的阶段性成果。
关键词
认罪认罚
量刑情节
刑事一体化
罪刑法定
诉讼效率
Chinese plea bargaining
sentencing circumstances
criminal integration
nulla poena sine lege
lawsuit efficiency
