摘要
以刑罚威慑为理论模型,通过对《刑法修正案(十一)》适用前网络著作权犯罪的实证研究发现,刑罚威慑网络著作权犯罪的实际效能不明显,表明修正前的侵犯著作权罪对网络著作权犯罪的惩治效果不理想。反思实证结论可知,特殊威慑效能水平有限是刑罚运行中的缺陷与立法规范自身的短路所致,一般威慑效能水平不高是社会公众对刑法的认同感欠缺所致。《刑法修正案(十一)》对侵犯著作权罪进行了较大幅度修改,通过增列犯罪对象、行为类型和提高法定刑等方式弥补了立法漏洞,对实践问题作出了针对性调整。未来要实现严惩网络著作权犯罪的立法目标,应当在司法层面进行调整以强化刑罚威慑。一方面,纠正轻判化的司法偏差,重罪重罚,实现“罪刑相适”;另一方面,加强对刑事判决书的说理,让公众充分参与司法裁判,获得对刑法的认同感。
Taking penalty deterrence as a theoretical model,through an empirical study of online copyright crimes before the application of the Criminal Law Amendment(No.11),it is found that the criminal sanction is insignificant,indicating that the punishment of copyright infringement crime on the online copyright crimes is not good.Rethinking the empirical conclusions,it is found that the limited level of special deterrence effectiveness is caused by the short circuit between the defects in the application of penalties and the legislative norms,the low level of general deterrence efficiency is due to the lack of public recognition of criminal law.In the Criminal Law Amendment(No.11),copyright infringement crime has been substantially revised,in which the legislative loopholes have been made up by the crime object,adding the behavior mode and increasing the legal penalty,and targeted adjustments have been made to the practical problems.To achieve the legislative goal of severely punishing online copyright crime in the future,adjustments should be made at the judicial level to strengthen penalty deterrence.On the one hand,we should correct judicial deviation of light punishment and heavy punishment for serious crimes,so as to achieve the“compatibility of crime and punishment”.On the other hand,we should reinforce the reasoning of judgments,allow the public to fully participate in the judicial judgments,and gain a sense of identity with criminal law.
作者
李芳芳
Li Fangfang(Law School,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610207,P.R.China)
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第3期64-71,共8页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“风险社会视阈下刑事立法科学性研究”(16AFX009)。
