期刊文献+

认知融合与乳腺癌患者情绪困扰的关系 被引量:3

The Relationship Between Cognitive Fusion and Emotional Distress of Breast Cancer Patient
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探究认知重评在认知融合与乳腺癌患者情绪困扰间的中介作用及核心自我评价的调节作用,为缓解乳腺癌患者的情绪困扰、促进其身心健康提供参考。方法:采用认知融合问卷、情绪调节问卷、核心自我评价量表和抑郁-焦虑-应激量表对潍坊市430例乳腺癌患者进行问卷调查。结果:共获得407份有效问卷,认知融合与认知重评负相关(r=-0.10,P<0.05),与情绪困扰正相关(r=0.62,P<0.01)。认知重评与情绪困扰负相关(r=-0.37,P<0.01)。认知重评在认知融合与情绪困扰间的中介作用显著,核心自我评价调节指数(index)显著。结论:认知重评在认知融合与情绪困扰间起中介作用,核心自我评价在乳腺癌患者认知融合与认知重评的认知加工过程中起调节作用。 Objective:To explore the mediator role of cognitive reappraisal between cognitive fusion and emotional distress and the moderator effect of core self-evaluation in this mediation,and to provide reference for alleviating emotional distress and the improvement of physical and mental health among breast cancer patients.Methods:430 breast cancer patients completed the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire,Emotion Regulation Questionnaire,Core Self-Evaluation Scale and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale.Results:A total of 407 valid questionnaires were obtained.Cognitive fusion negatively correlated with cognitive reappraisal(r=-0.10,P<0.05)and positively with emotional distress(r=0.62,P<0.01).Cognitive reappraisal negatively correlated with emotional distress(r=-0.37,P<0.01).Cognitive reappraisal had a significant mediator effect in the relationship between cognitive fusion and emotional distress.The moderated index of core self-evaluation was significant.Conclusion:Cognitive reappraisal plays a mediating role between cognitive fusion and emotional distress,and the mediation is moderated by the patient's core self-evaluation.
作者 杜贺 韩冰雪 王苗苗 滕帅 刘锦霞 季丽丽 卢国华 DU He(School of Psychology,Weifang Medical University,Weifang,Shandong,261053,China)
出处 《医学与社会》 北大核心 2021年第5期129-133,共5页 Medicine and Society
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划项目,编号为2017WS852。
关键词 乳腺癌 情绪困扰 认知融合 认知重评 核心自我评价 Breast Cancer Emotional Distress Cognitive Fusion Cognitive Reappraisal Core Self-Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献119

  • 1周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950. 被引量:3765
  • 2龙立荣,方俐洛,凌文辁.企业员工自我职业生涯管理的结构及关系[J].心理学报,2002,34(2):183-191. 被引量:96
  • 3吴超荣,甘怡群.核心自我评价:一个验证性因素分析[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(4):622-627. 被引量:51
  • 4吴文源.焦虑自评量表(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(S):235-238. 被引量:6
  • 5Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression an- xiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation, 1995. 112-115. 被引量:1
  • 6Crawford JR, Henry JD. The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non- clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2003, 42:111-131. 被引量:1
  • 7Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 1998, 10: 176- 181. 被引量:1
  • 8Taouk M, Lovibond PF, Laube R. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scales (DASS21). In Report for New South Wales Transcuhural Mental Health Centre. 2001, Cumberland Hospital: Sydney. 被引量:1
  • 9吴明隆.结构方程模型-AMOS的操作与应用.重庆:重庆大学.2009.309-323. 被引量:2
  • 10Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inentories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1995, 33:335-343. 被引量:1

共引文献4697

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部