期刊文献+

混合碳政策下双寡头供应链不同竞争模式的低碳生产决策

Decision of Low-carbon Production in Different Competition Models of Duopoly Supply Chain under the Mixed Carbon Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于混合碳政策(碳税—碳交易)背景,构建了供应链古诺博弈模型并分析其竞争决策问题。首先,通过构建分散—分散决策、集中—分散决策和集中—集中决策三种供应链竞争模式,求得碳减排决策与价格决策的均衡解,并在算例分析中讨论了不同竞争模式下碳减排决策与价格决策之间的关系;其次,通过敏感性分析得到不同竞争模式下混合碳政策对碳减排均衡决策的影响,所得结果可为供应链低碳生产决策提供依据。 Based on the background of the mixed carbon policy(carbon tax-carbon trading) implemented by Chinese government,Cournot(Duopoly) game model between supply chains is constructed and used for analyzing a series of competition decisions between supply chains. Based on constructing three supply chain competition models: decentralized-decentralized decision, centralized-decentralized decision, and centralized-centralized decision, the equilibrium solution of carbon emission reduction decision and price decision can be obtained. Through example analysis, the relationship between carbon emission reduction decisions and price decisions under the different competition modes become clear and definite. At the same time, through sensitivity analysis,the impact of mixed carbon policies on carbon emission reduction equilibrium decisions under different competition modes is obtained, providing a basis for supply chain decisions.
作者 董兴林 李晓菲 DONG Xinglin;LI Xiaofei(College of Economics and Management,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao 266590,China)
出处 《物流科技》 2021年第5期129-134,共6页 Logistics Sci-Tech
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划一般项目“统一授信模式供应链金融风险扩散机理与监管绩效研究”(17YJAZH018)。
关键词 碳交易 碳税 供应链竞争 古诺模型 carbon trading carbon tax supply chain competition Cournot model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献110

  • 1朱苏荣.碳税与碳交易的国际经验和比较分析[J].金融发展评论,2012(12):71-76. 被引量:6
  • 2国务院发展研究中心课题组.中国经济增长的前景分析[J].决策与信息,2005(8):4-4. 被引量:9
  • 3Weitzman M L. Prices vs. Quantities[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 41(4) : 477 -491. 被引量:1
  • 4Metcalf E G. Designing a carbon tax to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions [ J ]. Review of Enviromental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 63 - 83. 被引量:1
  • 5Avi-Yonah S R, Uhlmann D M. Combating global climate change: Why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade[J]. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2009, 28(3) : 3 -50. 被引量:1
  • 6Wittneben B F. Exxon is right: Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax[J], Energy Poli- cy, 2009, 37 (6) : 2462 - 2464. 被引量:1
  • 7Mann F R. The case for the carbon tax: How to overcome politics and find our green destiny [ J ]. Environmental Law Report- er, 2009, 39(2) : 10118 - 10126. 被引量:1
  • 8Stavins R N, Addressing climate change with a comprehensive US cap-and-trade system [ J ]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2008, 24(2) : 298 -321. 被引量:1
  • 9Murray B C, Richard G N, William A P. Balancing cost and emissions certainty: An allowance reserve for cap-and-trade [ J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 84 - 103. 被引量:1
  • 10Keohane N O. Cap-and-trade, rehabilitated: Using tradable permits to control U.S. greenhouse gases[ J]. Review of Envi- ronmental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 42 - 62. 被引量:1

共引文献362

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部