期刊文献+

我国医疗知情同意权代理制度存在的困境及其对策建议 被引量:3

The Dilemma and Countermeasures of Medical Informed Consent Agency System in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前中国医疗知情同意代理制度中存在着一些问题:代理权与生命权、隐私权等权利存在冲突,代理主体立法不统一和代理顺序未明确,代理权限缺乏限制和行使缺少监管,代理实践中救济途径不足与法律缺乏操作性等。通过实证研究和法理分析探究我国医疗知情同意制度的完善路径,结合中国国情借鉴国外的知情同意能力认定标准、医疗预先指示、代理能力审查等制度经验,针对当前中国知情同意代理制度的困境提出了强化代理原则指导、完善代理主体立法、多方限制代理权限、衔接家庭医生制度等建议。 The current medical informed consent agency system in China has many flaws, such as the conflicts between the agency power, the right to life and the right to privacy, the inconsistency of the agency legislation, undefined agent order, the lack of restrictions and supervision of the agency authority, the insufficiency of the remedies in the agent practice and the lack of the operability of the law, which lays hidden dangers for medical disputes.Through empirical research and Legal analysis,this paper explored the path to improve china’s medical informed consent system.learned from the experience of reforming foreign informed consent capability recognition standards, medical advance directives, agency capability review and combined with China’s national conditions. Aiming at the dilemma of the current informed consent agency system of China, the paper put forward a number of proposals such as strengthening the guidance of agency principles, perfecting the legislation of agency subjects, restricting the authority of agencies by multiple parties, and connecting the family doctor system.
作者 李欣慧 李明 LI Xinhui;LI Ming(Faculty of Law,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Beijng,102488,China;Doctor-Patient Relations Coordination Office,Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100010,China;Law of School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处 《中国医学伦理学》 2021年第5期541-545,共5页 Chinese Medical Ethics
关键词 知情同意权 代理权 代理制度 医疗行为 Informed Consent Right Agency Agency System Medical Treatment Action
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献108

  • 1履行知情同意原则的指导意见[J].医学与哲学,2004,25(9):5-8. 被引量:15
  • 2杨立新,袁雪石.论医疗机构违反告知义务的医疗侵权责任[J].河北法学,2006,24(12):42-48. 被引量:31
  • 3艾尔肯.论医师的说明义务[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,31(4):145-148. 被引量:2
  • 4刘明祥.《伤害罪若干问题比较研究》,载冯军主编.《比较刑法研究》,中国人民大学出版社2007年版,第376页. 被引量:1
  • 5[日]齐藤诚二.《医事刑法的基础理论》,多贺出版株式会社1997年版,第11页. 被引量:3
  • 6陈子平.《刑法总论》,元照出版有限公司(台湾)2008年版,第389页. 被引量:2
  • 7资料来源:新浪网: http ://survey. news. sina. com. en/result/53318, html, 访问时间:2011年12月20日. 被引量:1
  • 8Wendy Savage, Caesarean Section: Who Choose: the Woman or Her Doctor? in Donna L. Diekenson ed. , Ethical Is- sues in Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 271 - 2 . 被引量:1
  • 9Gwyn Tovey, Lee-ture Notes 2010-2011. Code: MedO1.02-v5-10. lOMedicalLaw, Topic 1 (ofl0) , Consent. Lecture 2 (of4) : Capac- ity to Consent to Medical Treatment, p. 13, http://www, topnotes, org/Med - 01 - 02 - v5 - 10 - 10 - Consent-Capacity. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 10Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH [ 1996 ] 1 FLR 762. 被引量:1

共引文献62

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部