摘要
在作为知识谱系的"80年代"中,包括当代文学史在内的文学史编写是个能够以小见大的命题,它沉淀了新时期文学界有关"现代化"与艺术审美的想象。历史地看,在影响80年代乃至后来当代文学史写作的因素中,首先值得关注的,是以"回归五四"为目标的思想哲学根基。其次,是多元共生的新文学话语场态,包括启蒙与救亡双重变奏理论视野中的"人的文学"与"人民文学"的版图重绘;夏志清等人对海外中国现代文学研究的传扬;"文学主体性"理论的建构及文学研究"向内转"观点的提出;有关"纯文学"观念的构想,等等。此外,五六十年代建立起来的当代文学史叙述模式的失效,也直接影响到80年代包括当代文学史在内的文学史写作。清理80年代文学史写作知识语境,是为了能够更客观地"回到历史情境中去"评价这一时期的文学史写作。
In the 1980 s genealogy of knowledge,the editing and writing of literary histories,including the history of contemporary literature,is a proposition that can help the eye pick out the tiny from an ocean of things and that settles the imagination of the new-era world of letters about‘modernity’and artistic aesthetics.Historically,of the factors that influenced the writing of literary histories in the 1980 s and subsequently,what deserves attention is the ideological and philosophical basis for the objective of‘returning to the May Fourth’.Secondly,it is the pluralistic and symbiotic site of new literary discourse,including the remapping of‘people literature’and‘people’s literature’in the field of vision of double variation theory of enlightenment and salvation,the modern Chinese literary studies as promoted overseas by C.T.Hsia,the construction of such theories as‘literary subjectivity’and the proposition of such views as a turn inwards for literary studies,and the conception of such things as‘pure literature’.In addition,the failure of the narrative mode of contemporary literary history as established in the1950 s and 1960 s has also impacted the writing of literary histories,including that of contemporary literary histories,in the1980 s.To sort out the genealogy of knowledge in relation to the writing of literary histories in the 1980 s is to return more objectively to the historical situation in order to evaluate the writing of literary history in this period.
出处
《华文文学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期69-79,共11页
Literatures in Chinese
基金
广东省教育厅人文社科类特色创新项目《文学史与文学批评:以中国当代文学史写作史为对象》的阶段性成果,项目编号:2015WTSCX100。
关键词
80年代
文学史写作
新文学话语场态
当代文学史叙述模式
The 1980s
writing of literary histories
new enlightenment
site of new-era literary discourse
narrative mode of contemporary literary history