摘要
涉外定牌加工商标侵权问题在我国学界和实务界的争论由来已久。近年来,最高人民法院在"PRETUL"案、"东风"案和"HONDA"案中的裁判思路和结论也大相迥异,究其根源在于司法机关以及学理界在惯性思维的指引性下依据商标侵权的一般原理和规则审视情况特殊的涉外定牌加工行为,解决个案纠纷时又忽视了商标法的内在体系。在经济全球化和商标强国建设战略背景下,秉持体系化思维,应当修改商标法,确立商标出口权,将商标出口行为纳入商标法的规制范围,并通过设置侵权例外为严格意义上的涉外定牌加工留下合法生存空间。
The trademark infringement problem of foreign OEM has long been a debate in the academic and practical circles in China. Recently, the Supreme People’s Court’s judgment ideas and conclusions in "Pretul", "Dongfeng" and "Honda" cases are quite different. The root lies in that the judicial organs and academic circles, guided by the inertial thinking, examine the special foreign licensing processing behaviors according to the general principles and rules of trademark infringement, and ignore the internal system of trademark law when solving case disputes. Under the background of economic globalization and trademark power building strategy, we should uphold systematic thinking, revise the trademark law, establish the trademark export right, bring the trademark export behavior into the regulation scope of the trademark law, and leave a legal living space for the processing of foreign-related licensing in a strict sense by setting infringement exceptions.
作者
包红光
Bao Hongguang(Center for studies of Intellectual Property Rights,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan,China)
出处
《社会科学论坛》
2021年第2期146-157,共12页
Tribune of Social Sciences
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目《品牌强国建设的制度保障研究》阶段性成果,项目编号:19JJD820060
湖南省教育厅科学研究优秀青年项目《商标侵权损害赔偿研究》阶段性成果,项目编号:16B109。
关键词
涉外定牌加工
商标侵权
体系化思维
商标政策
foreign OEM
trademark infringement
systematic thinking
trademark policy
