期刊文献+

中文版脊髓损伤步行指数量表的信度研究 被引量:2

Reliability of Chinese Version of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury Ⅱ
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过对脊髓损伤步行指数量表(Walking Index for Spinal Cord InjuryⅡ,WISCI-Ⅱ)的翻译和编制,进行心理学考评,检测其信度,建立中国人群适用的脊髓损伤步行功能评估专表。方法:按照入组及排除标准选取中山大学附属第三医院康复科入住的30例脊髓损伤患者,平均年龄42.7岁,其中颈段脊髓损伤13例、胸段9例、腰段8例。两名治疗师分别进行两次评估,对结果进行等级间相关系数分析,检验其重测信度及评估者间信度。结果:中文版WISCI-Ⅱ的重测信度相关系数范围评估者A为0.981~0.996(P<0.01),评估者B为0.969~0.993(P<0.01);评估者间信度相关系数范围第一天ICC为0.966~0.992(P<0.01),第二天ICC为0.950~0.989(P<0.01)。结论:中文版脊髓损伤步行指数量表作为脊髓损伤患者步行功能临床评估工具,具有良好的重测信度和评估者间信度。 Objective:To translate the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury Ⅱ into Chinese and to assess the reliability of the Chinese version of the WISCI-Ⅱ in patients with spinal cord injury(SCI).Methods:Thirty patients,with average age of 42.7 years.Level:13 cervical,9 thoracic,8 lumber;Assessment of maximum WISCI Ⅱ levels by two trained,blinded raters to evaluate test-retest and intra-rater reliability.Results:The intra-rater reliability correlation coefficient was between 0.981~0.996(P<0.01) for therapists A and 0.969~0.993(P<0.01) for therapists B,for the maximum WISCI Ⅱ level.The test-retest reliability for the maximum WISCI Ⅱ score was between 0.966~0.992(P<0.01) on day 1 and 0.950~0.989(P<0.01) on day2.Conclusion:The WISCI Ⅱ has high te st-rete st and intra-rater reliability when administered by trained raters.
作者 马晓丹 宋梅思 陈虹铮 陈培荣 吴丹丽 李奎 丘卫红 MA Xiao-dan;SONG Mei-si;CHEN Hong-zhen;CHEN Pei-rong;WU Dan-li;LI Kui;QIU Wei-hong(The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510630;Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center,Haikou,Hainan 571199)
出处 《按摩与康复医学》 2021年第5期8-11,共4页 Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 脊髓损伤 步行功能评估 中文版 重测信度 评估者间信度 spinal cord injury walking function assessment Chinese version test-retest reliability intra-rater reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1柳卫民,郑丽芳,梅元武.脑卒中患者生活质量的评估及其影响因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):142-144. 被引量:15
  • 2Shah S,Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel IndeX for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42:703-709. 被引量:1
  • 3Eakin P, Baird H. The Community Dependency Index:a standardized assessment of need and measure of outcome for community occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther, 1995,58 : 17-22. 被引量:1
  • 4Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkkuma H, et al. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil, 1997,11 : 28 -35. 被引量:1
  • 5Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The copenhagen strokes study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:161-165. 被引量:1
  • 6Kwon S,Hartzema AG,Duncan PW,et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke, 2004, 35: 918-923. 被引量:1
  • 7Dennis W, Pamela W, Sue ML. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional measure in stroke,the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:922-928. 被引量:1
  • 8Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22:702-715. 被引量:1
  • 9Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke :the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,5:922-928. 被引量:1
  • 10Van Bennekom CAM ,Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthe Index. J Clin Epidemiol, 1996,49:39-44. 被引量:1

共引文献852

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部