期刊文献+

论中西医话语的差异与共生

On the Difference and Symbiosis of Discourse between Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中西医话语产生于不同的民族文化土壤,形成于不同的时代,是两种各自独立的话语体系,存在诸多的差异性。从空间视角看,中医话语属于东方话语,西医话语属于西方话语;从时间视角看,中医话语属于古代话语,西医话语属于现代话语;从话语性质视角看,中医话语属于哲学话语,西医话语属于科学话语;从话语位势视角看,中医话语属于弱势话语,西医话语属于强势话语。但是,两种话语只是运用了不同的语言游戏规则,展现了不同的医学运行图景,不存在好坏和优劣之分。两种话语存在差异,但不存在对抗,两者可以求同存异,共同存在、共同生长、共同发展。 The discourse of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine is produced in the different national culture soil,forms in the different time,is two kind of respective independent discourse systems,has many differences.From the perspective of space,the discourse of traditional Chinese medicine belongs to the eastern discourse,while the discourse of western medicine belongs to the western discourse;from the perspective of time,the discourse of traditional Chinese medicine belongs to ancient discourse,while the discourse of western medicine belongs to modern discourse;from the perspective of discourse nature,TCM discourse belongs to philosophical discourse,while western medicine discourse belongs to scientific discourse;from the perspective of discourse potential,the discourse of traditional Chinese medicine belongs to the weak discourse,while the discourse of western medicine belongs to the strong discourse.However,the two discourses only use different rules of language game and show different medical operation pictures,and there is no difference between good and bad.There are differences between the two discourses,but there is no confrontation,they can seek common ground while reserving differences,co-exist,co-grow and co-develop.
作者 周亚东 Zhou Yadong(College of Humanities and International Education Exchange,Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Hefei 230012,China)
出处 《锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)》 2021年第2期99-103,共5页 Journal of Jinzhou Medical University(Social Science Edition)
基金 安徽省高校协同创新项目“新安医学文化传承与创新研究”(编号:GXXT-2019-050)的研究成果。
关键词 中医话语 西医话语 差异 共生 discourse of traditional Chinese medicine discourse of western medicine difference symbiosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1胡塞尔.欧洲科学的危机与超越论的现象学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.. 被引量:23
  • 2Hall,D. Modern China and the Postmodern West IN L.Cahoone (ed.) From Modernism to Fostmodernism : An Anthology. Oxford : Blackwell Publishers, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 3Heidegger, Martin. Traditional Language and Technological Language Translated by Wanda Torres Gregor.Journal of Philosophical Research, 1998, 23. 被引量:1
  • 4Lacan, J. Ecrits : A Selection. London: Tavistock, 1977. 被引量:1
  • 5Saussure, F. d. Course in General Linguistics: London:Fontana, 1974. 被引量:1
  • 6Shen, Vincent.Scientific Rationality and Hermeneutic Reasonableness: Implications for Education. In Shen,V. ,T. Doan&F. Wallner(eds.). Philosophy of Science and Education : Chinese and European Views. Wadhington: The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 7Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophlcus.Trans. D. F. Pears&B. F. McGuinness. London:Routledge&Kegan Paul, 1961. 被引量:1
  • 8Wittgenstein, L. Lectures and Conversations On Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. C. K, Barrett.Oxford: Blackwell, 1966. 被引量:1
  • 9Wittgenstein, L. On Certainty, ed. G. E. M, Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe and Denis Paul Oxford : Blackwell, 1969. 被引量:1
  • 10Wittgenstein,L. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Mott,1972. 被引量:1

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部