摘要
片面实行犯是否成立共同犯罪,存在否定说与肯定说之争。如果将片面实行犯视为单独犯,则有违背罪责刑相适应原则之嫌。共同正犯的"部分行为全部责任"实质是"全部行为全部责任",对片面实行犯按该原则处罚并未违反责任主义原则。此外,采用何种共犯本质学说与是否承认片面实行犯并无必然关联。通过对我国《刑法》第二十五条第一款的教义学解读可以发现,片面实行犯符合我国关于共同犯罪的规定,并且在司法实践中已存在相关判决。因此,我国应采用片面实行犯肯定说。
There is a dispute between negative doctrines and affirmative doctrines on whether the unilateral perpetrator can establish a joint crime.If the unilateral perpetrator is regarded as the single perpetrator,he will be suspected of violating the principle of suiting punishment to crime and criminal responsibility.The essence of“full responsibility for partial acts”of a joint principal offender is“full responsibility for all the acts”.For unilateral perpetrators,the principle of personal responsibility is not violated to punish them according to the principle above.In addition,there is no inevitable connection between which nature doctrine of common offense to adopt and whether to admit the unilateral perpetrator.It can be found through the dogmatic interpretation of Article 25,Paragraph 1 of Criminal Law that the unilateral perpetrator is consistent with the provisions on joint crime and there have been already relevant judgments in judicial practice.Therefore,our country should adopt affirmative doctrines of the unilateral perpetrator.
作者
刘浩雨
LIU Hao-yu(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 450001)
出处
《怀化学院学报》
2021年第1期63-67,共5页
Journal of Huaihua University
关键词
片面实行犯
单独犯
部分行为全部责任
行为共同说
共同犯罪
unilateral perpetrator
single perpetrator
full responsibility for partial acts
theory of action commonness
joint crime
