期刊文献+

应用型本科院校基础课课程评价模式研究

Research on the Evaluation Model of Basic Courses in Applied Undergraduate Colleges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用型本科院校与其他院校最大的区别在于应用技术型人才的培养,基础课作为大学生公共必修课程之一,过程性考核的课程评价方式更能激发大学生学习积极性,这在应用型本科院校更为重要。从终成性评价为主的课程评价向过程性的课程评价模式转变,尤其是过程性考核方面注重课堂实践教学,更利于应用技术型人才的实践能力培养。 The biggest difference between applied undergraduate colleges and other colleges lies in the cultivation of applied technology talents.Basic courses are one of the public compulsory courses for college students.The course evaluation method of process assessment can stimulate college students'enthusiasm for learning.More important.The transition from final evaluation-based curriculum evaluation to a processbased curriculum evaluation model,especially in the aspect of process assessment,focuses on classroom practice teaching,which is more conducive to the cultivation of practical ability of applied technical talents.
作者 林苏云 LIN Suyun(School of Marxism Studies,Wuxi Taihu University,Wuxi,Jiangsu Province,214064 China)
出处 《科技创新导报》 2020年第36期228-230,共3页 Science and Technology Innovation Herald
基金 无锡太湖学院高教研究所,(项目编号:C-2019050),项目名称:民办高校教学质量评价体系研究。
关键词 基础课 专题化教学 过程性评价 课堂实践 Basic courses Thematic teaching Process evaluation Classroom practice
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献34

  • 1潘鹤林,黄婕,卢杨,朱忆天.高校化工原理课程思政教学探索与实践[J].化工高等教育,2020,37(1):110-114. 被引量:70
  • 2Harvard University.About the Q-History of the Q [EB/OL].(2012-07-21)[2015-06-28].ht- tp://www.fas.harvard,edu/?evals/about.htm. 被引量:1
  • 3Harvard University.About the Q [EB/OL].(2011-04-25)[2015-06-28].http://www.fas.harvard,edu/?evals/about.htm. 被引量:1
  • 4Harvard University.About the Q-The Q Evalua- tion [EB/OL].(2013-04-21)[2015-06-28].http://www.fas.harvard,edu/?evals/about.htm. 被引量:1
  • 5Wilkinson J,Derek Bok Center.Interpreting Feedback and Evaluations [EB/OL].(2013-09-02)[2015-06-28].http://bokcenter.harvard,edu/interpreting-feedback-and-evaluations. 被引量:1
  • 6Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.Cer- tificates of Excellence and Distinction in Teaching [EB/OL].(2013-05-17)[2015-06-28].http:// bokcenter.harvard,edu/certificates-excel- lence. 被引量:1
  • 7Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.De- rek C.Bok Award [EB/OL].(2013-04-25)[2015-07-01].http://bokcenter.harvard,edu/ derek-c-bok-award. 被引量:1
  • 8Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning.Ear- ly Feedback Forms [EB/OL].(2013-07-08)[2015-07-01].http://bokcenter.harvard,edu/ early-feedback. 被引量:1
  • 9别敦荣,孟凡.论学生评教及高校教学质量保障体系的改善[J].高等教育研究,2007,28(12):77-83. 被引量:232
  • 10潮兴兵,黄天成,魏健宁.工具理性与价值理性视角下的教学评价[J].教学与管理(理论版),2008(6):12-13. 被引量:9

共引文献257

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部