摘要
目的 :对临床领导力量表(Clinical Leadership Survey,CLS)进行翻译与跨文化调试,检验中文版CLS的信度和效度,为我国临床护士领导力研究提供有效工具。方法 :通过直译-回译法将CLS翻译为中文,通过专家咨询法和对40名临床护士的预调查进行跨文化调试;便利抽取315名临床护士进行正式调查,4名专家进行内容效度评价,以检验中文版CLS的信度和效度。结果 :中文版CLS由5个维度,15个条目构成。项目分析结果显示,条目临界比CR值均>3.0,条目与量表总分相关系数为0.680~0.829(P<0.01);验证性因子分析显示,χ^(2)/df=2.413,RMSEA=0.079,TLI=0.917,CFI=0.941;内容效度评价结果显示,条目水平的内容效度指数与量表总体内容效度指数均为1;信度分析结果显示,量表总体Cronbach’s α系数为0.942,各维度Cronbach’s α系数为0.748~0.889,重测信度为0.892(P<0.001)。结论 :中文版CLS信度和效度良好,可作为评价我国临床护士领导力的有效工具。
Objective: To conduct translation and cross-cultural modification of the Clinical Leadership Survey(CLS), to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version. Methods: The Chinese version of CLS was developed through the process of translation and back-translation, conduct cross-cultural modification through expert consultation and pilot-test. Totally 315 clinical nurses were investigated through convenience sampling for test the reliability and validity of Chinese version of CLS. Four experts conducted content validity evaluation. Results: The Chinese version of CLS consisted of 5 factors and 15 items. The items analysis indicated that the CR was more than 3.0 and correlation coefficients between the items and the total score were 0.680-0.829(P<0.01). The confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ^(2)/df=2.413, RMSEA=0.079, TLI=0.917 and CFI=0.941. The content validity results were confirmed with I-CVIs and S-CVI of 1. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the overall scale was 0.942, and ranging from 0.748-0.889 for each factor. The test-retest reliability was 0.892(P<0.001). Conclusion: The Chinese version of CLS has proved to be reliable and valid. It can be used as a valid tool to evaluate the leadership of clinical nurses in China.
作者
李全
万巧琴
杨悦
LI Quan;WAN Qiaoqin;YANG Yue(Nursing School of Peking University,Beijing,100191,China;不详)
出处
《中国护理管理》
CSCD
2021年第2期186-190,共5页
Chinese Nursing Management
关键词
临床领导力
护士
临床护士领导力
信度
效度
clinical leadership
nurse
staff nurse clinical leadership
reliability
validity
