期刊文献+

论大数据在著作权法保护中的冲突与协调 被引量:10

On the conflict and coordination of big data in the protection of copyright law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代网络技术与科技手段使大数据的利用与传播打破了传统的交易模式,使数字时代的盗版行为成为不受时空限制的低成本行为,甚至可能以牺牲“创作”为代价换取信息社会的快速发展。大数据资源法律救济保护的滞后性难题,引发了人们对大数据在著作权法保护中的冲突与协调的思考。为实现对大数据权利人的保护和社会利益最大化目的,文章以大数据及其权属论争为基点,通过法经济学与法哲学的理论范式推演探知大数据的权属划分与价值收益,得出大数据适用于著作权法保护的可行性结论。并借鉴大数据在英美法系与大陆法系法律框架下的经验与共识,解构大数据适用著作权法的助益与阻滞因素,从而尝试以设立“数据权”或与其他法律制度兼容的形式检验法学科学处理现代科学的技术理性,为大数据的法律保护提供更多可能性。 The use of modern network technology and scientific and technological methods has broken the traditional transaction model in the use and dissemination of big data,making piracy in the digital age a low-cost dependency that is not limited by time and space,or even sacrificing“creation”for the rapid development of the information society.Facing the lagging problem of the protection of big data resources through legal relief,people are thinking about conflicts and coordination of big data in the protection of copyright law.In order to achieve the purpose of protecting big data rights holders and maximizing social benefits,this paper takes big data and its tenure debate as the starting point,and uses the theoretical paradigm of law economics and legal philosophy to derive the ownership division and value gains of big data.The feasibility conclusion that big data is applicable to the protection of copyright law is drawn.Drawing on the experience and consensus of big data in the legal framework of the common law system and civil law system,deconstructing the benefits and hindrances of the application of copyright law to big data,the paper tries to establish a“data right”or a form compatible with other legal systems to examine the scientific rationality of jurisprudence when facing with modern science,and provide more possibilities for the legal protection of big data.
作者 田小楚 高山行 TIAN Xiaochu;GAO Shanxing(Law School,Xi’an 710049,P.R.China;School of Management,Xi’an Jiaotong University,Xi’an 710049,P.R.China)
出处 《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第1期141-151,共11页 Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部规划基金项目“大数据资源治理的产权界定及管理机制研究”(19YJAZHO19)。
关键词 大数据 著作权法 数据产权 数据权属 复制权 合理使用 big data copyright law data property rights data ownership reproduction rights fair use
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献29

  • 1曹新明.论知识产权冲突协调原则[J].法学研究,1999,21(3):72-81. 被引量:52
  • 2Jason Mazzone.Copyfraud[J].New York University LawReview,2006,(3). 被引量:1
  • 3Department of Commerce.Department of Commerce.Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights,IntellectualProperty and the National Information Infrastructure:The Re-port of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights[R].Washington:U.S.Department of Commerce,1995. 被引量:1
  • 4Wendy J.Gordon.Fair Use as Market Failure:A Struc-tural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Pre-decessors[J].Columbia Law Review,1982,(8). 被引量:1
  • 5P.Bernt Hugenholtz.Copyright,Contract and Code:WhatWill Remain of the Public Domain?[J].Brooklyn Journal ofInternational Law,2000,(6). 被引量:1
  • 6Lucie Guibault.Contracts and Copyright Exemptions[A].P.B.Hugenholtz,Ed.Copyright and Electronic Commerce―Legal Aspects of Electronic Copyright Management[C].TheHague,London,Boston:Kluwer Law International,2000. 被引量:1
  • 7Pamela Samuelson.Copyright,Digital Data,and FairUse in Digital Networked Environments[A].Ejan Mackaay,Daniel Poulin,Pierre Trudel,Eds.The Electronic Superhigh-way[C].Den Haag:Kluwer,1995. 被引量:1
  • 8Joel Rothstein Wolfson.Contract and Copyright Are Notat War:A Reply to"The Metamorphosis of Contract into Ex-pand[J].California Law Review,1999,(1). 被引量:1
  • 9David Nimmer,Elliot Brown,Gary N.Frischling.TheMetamorphosis of Contract into Expand[J].California Law Re-view,1999,(1). 被引量:1
  • 10Michael W.Carroll.Fixing Fair Use[J].North CarolinaLaw Review,2007,(4). 被引量:1

共引文献18

同被引文献185

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部