摘要
在目前行政公益诉讼的司法实践中适用确认违法判决时出现异化,检察机关在一个案件中既请求确认违法又请求责令履行的,部分人民法院也予以支持该诉讼请求,使得产生两种冲突判决,究其深层原因,司法人员面对一项全新制度,没有正确把握行政公益诉讼判决类型的特殊性,并与行政诉讼法顺利衔接。因此,在构建行政公益诉讼制度时,需要充分重视其判决类型的特殊性,进一步细化行政公益诉讼判决类型,完善行政公益诉讼制度。
In the current judicial practice of administrative public interest litigation,there is alienation in the application of confirmation of violation judgments.In a case where procuratorial organs both request confirmation of violation and request for execution,some people’s courts also support the litigation request,resulting in two conflicting judgments.Investigating the underlying reason,the judicial personnel faced a brand new system and did not correctly grasp the particularity of the types of administrative public interest litigation judgments,and smoothly integrated with the administrative litigation law.Therefore,when constructing an administrative public interest litigation system,it is necessary to pay full attention to the particularity of its judgment types,further refine the types of administrative public interest litigation judgments,and improve the administrative public interest litigation system.
作者
李南
LI nan(Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan,411105)
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2020年第5期44-51,共8页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
行政公益诉讼
判决类型
诉讼请求
特殊化
administrative public interest litigation
judgment type
litigation request
specialization
