摘要
在批判性思维研究领域,《德尔菲报告》提出的批判性思维定义由于吸收了当代重要批判性思维学者的意见,反映了专家共识,因而具有很大的权威性。该定义引入中国大学批判性思维教科书也有十几年了。晋荣东对该定义中的一个关键词“judgment(s)”的中译——“判断”,提出了异议并建议将其改译为“判断力”。但是,仔细考察德尔菲研究项目主持人费西万对该定义的阐述就会发现,“判断力”的译法不能成立。李普曼关于批判性思维与判断的论述也表明,批判性思维定义中的judgment(s)是“判断”而非“判断力”。
In the field of critical thinking research,the definition of critical thinking proposed in the Delphi Report has great authority because it absorbs the opinions of important contemporary critical thinking scholars and reflects the expert consensus.The definition has been introduced into critical thinking textbooks in Chinese university for more than a decade.Jin Rongdong raised an objection to the Chinese translation of“judgment”to“判断”,a key word in the definition,and suggested translating it into“判断力”.But a closer examination of the definition by the Delphic research project's lead author,Peter A.Faciane,reveals that the translation of“判断力”fails.Matthew Lipman's discussion on critical thinking and judgment(s)also indicates that judgment(s)in the definition of critical thinking is“判断”rather than“判断力”.
作者
武宏志
WU Hong-zhi(School of Politics,Law and Public Administration,Yan'an University,Yan'an 716000,Shaanxi)
出处
《延安大学学报（社会科学版）》
2021年第1期28-37,共10页
Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“新兴学科视野中的法律逻辑及其拓展研究”(18ZDA034)。
