摘要
国际投资仲裁作为解决国际投资争议的机制,从诞生至今获得了绝大多数国家和投资者的普遍接受。然而,随着国际投资仲裁案件的不断增多,该制度存在的不足逐渐显现。目前国际社会正在积极探索改革投资仲裁制度的方案,其中最引人注目的便是建立国际投资仲裁上诉机制。尽管在当前国际投资条约体系下建立多边上诉机制面临挑战,但上诉机制所能发挥的作用以及《毛里求斯公约》所带来的以多边文书修改双边条约的成功经验让上诉机制的建立成为必要且可行。目前我国已经提交了主张建立常设上诉机制的立场文件,在未来投资争端解决制度改革过程中也需要积极探索切实可行的改革方案。
As a mechanism for settling Investor-State disputes, international investment arbitration has been widely accepted by most States and investors since its birth. However, with the increasing number of investment disputes to be resolved through investment arbitration, the defects of the system gradually emerge. The international community has been actively exploring the possible reform of the international investment arbitration system, the most notable of which is the establishment of an appellate mechanism for international investment arbitration. The Chinese government submitted its position document about establishment of Appellate Mechanism in ISDS procedure to UNCITRAL WG III in July 2019. Despite enormous challenges of establishing a multilateral appellate mechanism under the current investment treaty system, if an appellate mechanism does increase the correctness of the award on the basis of guaranteeing consistency, thereby alleviating people’s challenge to the legitimacy of the ISDS system, then its establishment is of necessity. Meanwhile, Mauritius Convention, as a successful precedent for amending bilateral treaties by multilateral instruments, makes the establishment of multilateral appellate mechanism possible.
作者
梁丹妮
戴蕾
LIANG Danni;DAI Lei
出处
《武大国际法评论》
CSSCI
2020年第6期98-118,共21页
Wuhan University International Law Review
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“国际投资协定发展趋势研究”(项目批准号:14BFX138)阶段性成果。
关键词
国际投资仲裁
上诉机制
国际投资条约
国际投资争端解决
毛里求斯公约
international investment arbitration
appellate mechanism
international investment treaty
international investment disputes settlement
Mauritius Convention
