摘要
将军事技术视为“用于军事领域的技术”的定义方式忽视了对在研技术的划归,易于引发“军事技术”与“民用技术”的含混。借助后现象学“人—技术—世界”框架,可以发现军事技术源于民用生产技术使用情境的变更,在占据生存条件的过程中获得了相对独立的地位。军事技术调节着人们的战争感知,在诠释战争的同时也遮蔽着对战争的判断。近代自然科学与资本主义现代性扩张的结合,使军事技术走上了能量杀伤的“暴力”道路,战略威慑武器则使其因失去使用情境而成为国家博弈的“他者”与“背景”。在暴力的退隐中,可以发现军事技术有别于作为“存在的传递”的民用技术,其结构性本质是对“存在的占据”,是实现政治目标的“胜力”。
Using“technology applied in the military field”to define“military technology”ignores the classification of technology under R&D,which tends to cause the conceptual ambiguity between“military technology”and“civilian technology”.With the help of the post-phenomenological analysis structure of“human-technology-world”,it can be found that military technology originates from the usage context variation of civilian technology,which embarks on a relatively independent development path.Military technology regulates the perceptual connection between human and military technology,and obscures people's judgment on wars.The combination of modern natural science and the expansion of capitalist modernity makes military technology embark on a path which is“chasing for violence”.However,the emergence of strategic deterrence weapon makes military technology lose its usage context,transformed into the“others”and“background”of superpower games.In the vanishing of military technology's violence nature,it is clear that,military technology,as“the occupation of being”and“the chasing for victory”has a structural difference from civilian technology which is“the occupation of being”.
作者
吴奕澎
WU Yipeng(School of Art and Science, National University of Defense and Technology, Changsha 410073, China)
出处
《东北大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期9-17,共9页
Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
关键词
后现象学
军事技术
人—技术—世界
post-phenomenology
military technology
human-technology-world
