摘要
从经济基础决定上层建筑的基本原理来看,资本主义法治是生产资料私有制发展的必然结果。马克思对资本主义法治的批判深深扎根于资本主义生产方式的经济现实,从拜物教观念、劳动、生产关系三个角度层层深入,揭示了资本主义法治虚伪性与狭隘性的经济动因以及不平等、不自由的价值实质。其中,商品、货币、资本拜物教观念内涵了人本质的物化现象,成为制约现实社会法治遵循的主观因素;异化劳动和雇佣劳动中剩余价值剥削的本质,成为法治与自由相背离的现实基质;资本主义社会生产资料私有制的经济关系成为“私人利益”合法化的经济实质。
Judging from the basic principle that the economic base determines the superstructure,the capitalist rule of law is the inevitable result of the development of private ownership of the means of production.Marx’s criticism of capitalist rule of law is deeply rooted in the economic reality of capitalist mode of production.It reveals the economic motivation of the hypocrisy and narrowness of the capitalist rule of law and the essence of the value of inequality and non-freedom from the perspectives of fetishism,labor and production relations.Among them,the concepts of commodity,currency and capital fetishism have connoted the materialization of human nature and have become the subjective factor that restricts the rule of law in the real society;the essence of surplus value exploitation in alienated labor and hired labor has become the reality base of the deviation between the rule of law and freedom;the economic relation of private ownership of the means of production in the capitalist society has become the economic essence of the legalization of“private interests”.
作者
赵慧玲
ZHAO Hui-ling(School of Marxism,Tianjin University of Science and Technology,Tianjin 300457,China)
出处
《北京教育学院学报》
2020年第6期43-49,共7页
Journal of Beijing Institute of Education
基金
国家社科基金青年项目“新时代我国青少年学生马克思主义信仰培育研究”(18CKS019)
天津市教委科研计划项目(人文社科)“新时代高校意识形态安全建设研究”(2019SK145)。
关键词
马克思
资本主义法治
拜物教
雇佣劳动
生产资料私有制
Marx
capitalist rule of law
fetishism
hired labor
private ownership of the means of production
