期刊文献+

网状Meta分析GRADE证据总结表的制订、解读与应用 被引量:7

Development,elaboration and application of grade summary of finding table for network meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 GRADE工作组针对网状Meta分析(NMA)制订了GRADE证据总结(SoF)表,目的是规范NMA结果的证据分级过程和结果展示。本文对NMA-SoF表的主要内容进行详细介绍,并举例说明SoF表的使用方法和注意事项。 The summary of finding(SoF)table for network meta-analysis(NMA)was developed by the GRADE working group to facilitate and consolidate understanding NMA findings and GRADE certainty of evidence.This paper introduces the development process,the structure of NMA-SoF and limitations.A NMA publication was presented as an example to comprehensively illustrate the application of the NMA-SoF table.
作者 王巍巍 杨智荣 孙凤 詹思延 WANG Weiwei;YANG Zhirong;SUN Feng;ZHAN Siyan(The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders&Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders,Beijing Anding Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100088,P.R.China;Primary Care Unit,School of Clinical Medicine,University of Cambridge,Cambridge CB18RN,UK;Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,P.R.China;Center of Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Research,Peking University,Beijing 100191,P.R.China;Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100191,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第12期1471-1476,共6页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:72074011) 北京市属医院科研培育项目(编号:PX2019071)。
关键词 GRADE 网状Meta分析 证据总结表 GRADE Network meta-analysis Summary of findings
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献60

  • 1Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990. 被引量:1
  • 2Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet, 2009, 373: 774-779. 被引量:1
  • 3Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club, 2006, 144(1): A8-9. 被引量:1
  • 4Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 1170-1173. 被引量:1
  • 5Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 924-926. 被引量:1
  • 6Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336: 995-998. 被引量:1
  • 7Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336:1049-1051. 被引量:1
  • 8Schunemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek l, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336:1106-1110. 被引量:1
  • 9Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ, 2008, 337: a744. 被引量:1
  • 10Brozek J, Oxman A, Scheunemann HJ. GRADEpro. [Computer program].Version 3.2 for Windows. Available at http://mcmaster. flintbox.com/technology.asp?Page53993 and http://www.cc-ims.net/ revman/gradepro. Accessed October 21, 2010. 被引量:1

共引文献286

同被引文献86

引证文献7

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部