期刊文献+

一侧膈神经上根联合舌下神经甲舌肌支选择性喉返神经修复术治疗双侧声带麻痹的临床分析 被引量:11

Clinical analysis of selective laryngeal reinnervation using upper root of phrenic nerve and hypoglossal nerve branch in the treatment of bilateral vocal fold paralysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价一侧膈神经上根联合舌下神经甲舌肌支选择性喉返神经修复术(以下简称选择性喉返神经修复术)对双侧声带麻痹患者气道和嗓音质量的改善作用。方法对2012年1月至2016年12月,在海军军医大学第一附属医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科行选择性喉返神经修复术的39例资料完整的双侧声带麻痹患者的病例资料行回顾性研究。所有患者术前术后均行频闪喉镜、嗓音主观评估、声学参数、喉肌电图及肺功能检查,并进行至少2年随访,评价疗效及安全性。声音总嘶哑度评分及VHI-10评分数据采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析,声学参数[包括基频微扰(Jitter)、振幅微扰(Shimmer)、噪谐比(NHR)]、最长发声时间(MPT)值和肺功能参数数据采用配对t检验进行统计分析。结果39例患者中,术后发生感染及出血各1例。术后4~8个月,所有患者发音时声带均可内收,35例患者吸气时声带达到中、重度的外展运动,2例始终仅轻度外展,2例无外展运动,中度以上运动幅度的恢复率达89.7%(35/39),并顺利拔管,随访2年无变化。术后12个月时嗓音总嘶哑度G及VHI-10评分较术前均明显降低(P值均<0.05),声学参数Jitter、Shimmer、NHR及MPT较术前均明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05)。术后3个月,患者肺功能大部分参数恢复到正常参考值水平,术后12个月最大吸气压力(PImax)值仍略低于正常水平,但与术前相比均有显著改善(P值均<0.05)。术后12个月时患者肌电图资料显示,37例患者吸气时双侧环杓后肌均呈干扰相电位,发音时双侧甲杓肌亦为干扰相电位,其中2例还存在明显错向电位。2例外展功能恢复不佳者环杓后肌电位明显较弱。长期随访仅1例外展运动幅度减弱,但不影响呼吸功能。结论本研究采用选择性喉返神经修复术治疗双侧声带麻痹,恢复生理性声带外展内收运动的成功率高、疗效稳定、并发症少,值得� Objective To evaluate the airway and voice quality improvement in patients with bilateral vocal fold paralysis(BVFP)who underwent selective laryngeal reinnervation surgery.Methods From January 2012 to December 2016,a retrospective study was conducted in 39 patients with BVFP who underwent selective laryngeal reinnervation surgery in Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University.All patients were examined by videostroboscopy,vocal function assessment,laryngeal electromyography and pulmonary function test before and after the surgery,and followed up for at least 2 years to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the surgery.Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the G score and VHI-10 score data.Paired t-test was used to analyze acoustic parameters,MPT values and pulmonary function parameters.Results Postoperative infection and hemorrhage occurred in one patient separately.Videostroboscopic videos showed that at 4-8 months postoperatively,vocal folds in 35 patients achieved moderate or severe abduction during inspiration,2 patients only achieved mild abduction,2 patients showed no abduction,while all patients achieved adduction in bilateral vocal cords during phonation.The recovery rate of moderate-to-severe abduction was 89.7%(35/39),and these patients were decannulated successfully.At 12 months after operation,G score and VHI-10 score were significantly lower than those before operation(P<0.05),and the acoustic parameters jitter,shimmer,HNR and MPT were significantly improved(P<0.05).Most of the parameters of the pulmonary function test at 3 months postoperatively returned to the normal reference level,while the maximum inspiratory pressure(PImax)at 12 months after operation was still slightly lower than the normal level,but it was significantly improved compared with preoperative value(P<0.05).The EMG data at 12 months postoperatively showed full interference potentials in 37 patients in bilateral posterior cricoarytenoid muscles during inspir
作者 李孟 郑宏良 陈世彩 朱敏辉 江昊 刘菲 高颖娜 王伟 张才云 陈梦婕 Li Meng;Zheng Hongliang;Chen Shicai;Zhu Minhui;Jiang Hao;Liu Fei;Gao Yingna;Wang Wei;Zhang Caiyun;Chen Mengjie(Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Navy Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China)
出处 《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期1016-1021,共6页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
关键词 声带麻痹 喉返神经 神经再支配 膈神经 舌下神经 Vocal cord paralysis Recurrent laryngeal nerve Laryngealreinnervation Phrenic nerve Hypoglossal nerve
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1郑宏良,李兆基,周水淼,孙继虎.颈袢主支支配声带内收肌的显微外科解剖学研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1994,8(2):81-83. 被引量:17
  • 2张玉和,姚班,徐鹏霄,贺智.替代神经吻合法治疗喉返神经麻痹的解剖学研究[J].武警医学,1995,6(5):252-256. 被引量:1
  • 3Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, et al. The Voice Handicap Index ( VHI ) : development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1997, 6:66-70. 被引量:1
  • 4Lam PK, Chan KM, Ho WK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese Voice Handicap Index-10. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116:1192-1198. 被引量:1
  • 5Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114: 1549-1556. 被引量:1
  • 6Hsiung MW, Lu P, Kang BH, et al. Measurement and validation of the voice handicap index in voice-disordered patients in Taiwan. J Laryngol Otol, 2003, 117:478-481. 被引量:1
  • 7Amir O, Ashkenazi O, Leibovitzh T, et al. Applying the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) to dysphonic and nondysphonic Hebrew speakers. J Voice, 2006, 20:318-324. 被引量:1
  • 8Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432. 被引量:1
  • 9Guimaraes I, Abberton E. An investigation of the Voice Handicap Index with speakers of Portuguese: preliminary data. J Voice, 2004, 18:71-82. 被引量:1
  • 10Hakkesteegt MM, Wieringa MH, Gerritsma E J, et al. Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Voice Handicap Index. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2006, 58 : 132-138. 被引量:1

共引文献169

同被引文献133

引证文献11

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部