摘要
虽然我国刑法立法采取的是结果论的罪过形式判断根据,但在司法解释和刑法解释学领域以行为为根据来判断罪过形式的情况则大量存在,结果论与行为论虽交互使用但处于非此即彼的状态,致使乱象丛生。乱象形成的原因主要是受罪过形式概念的局限,普遍缺乏刑法教义学理念以及受单一罪过说束缚。在罪过形式的判断根据上,不论结果论还是行为论,运用于判断所有犯罪的罪过形式时均存在局限性,普遍折射出责任主义相对缺乏。为了实现刑法的全面评价和杜绝刑罚擅断,应当针对行为犯和结果犯分别采用行为论的罪过形式判断根据和"行为—结果"论的罪过形式判断根据。
Although China’s Criminal Code adopts the theory of judging culpability form according to consequence, there is a great deal of evidence of judging culpability form according to behavior in the field of judicial interpretation and hermeneutics of criminal law. Consequentialism and behaviorism are used interactively, but in a state of either this or that, which results in disorder, and derives the undue disputes over the culpability form of the same crime and uncertain scope of punishment. The main reasons for the disorder include the limitation of the concept of culpability form, the general lack of the idea of strafrechtsdogmatik and the shackle of the theory of single culpability. On the judging basis of culpability, whether consequentialism or behaviorism, when used to judge the culpability form of all crimes, has inevitable limitations, and reflects the relative lack of the idea of culpability. In order to realize the comprehensive evaluation from criminal law and prevent arbitrary punishment, the theory of judging culpability form according to behavior should be applied to the offense of act, for the consequential offense, the theory of judging culpability form according to behavior and consequence should be established.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期73-85,共13页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
罪过形式
判断根据
刑法评价
责任主义
culpability form
judging basis
evaluation from criminal law
doctrine of culpability
