期刊文献+

Methodological quality(risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better? 被引量:39

下载PDF
导出
摘要 Methodological quality(risk of bias)assessment is an important step before study initiation usage.Therefore,accurately judging study type is the first priority,and the choosing proper tool is also important.In this review,we introduced methodological quality assessment tools for randomized controlled trial(including individual and cluster),animal study,non-randomized interventional studies(including follow-up study,controlled before-and-after study,before-after/pre-post study,uncontrolled longitudinal study,interrupted time series study),cohort study,case-control study,cross-sectional study(including analytical and descriptive),observational case series and case reports,comparative effectiveness research,diagnostic study,health economic evaluation,prediction study(including predictor finding study,prediction model impact study,prognostic prediction model study),qualitative study,outcome measurement instruments(including patient-reported outcome measure development,content validity,structural validity,internal consistency,cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance,reliability,measurement error,criterion validity,hypotheses testing for construct validity,and responsiveness),systematic review and meta-analysis,and clinical practice guideline.The readers of our review can distinguish the types of medical studies and choose appropriate tools.In one word,comprehensively mastering relevant knowledge and implementing more practices are basic requirements for correctly assessing the methodological quality.
出处 《Military Medical Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2020年第3期359-370,共12页 军事医学研究(英文版)
基金 supported(in part)by the Entrusted Project of National commission on health and health of China(No.2019099) the National Key Research and Development Plan of China(2016YFC0106300) the Nature Science Foundation of Hubei Province(2019FFB03902)。
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

共引文献65

同被引文献499

引证文献39

二级引证文献189

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部