期刊文献+

中医药健康素养量表的编制及信效度检验 被引量:1

Development and Reliability and Validity Tests of Health Literacy Scale in Traditional Chinese Medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制中医药健康素养量表,并检验其信效度。方法编制中医药健康素养量表初稿,采取方便抽样的方式在湖南长沙两所高校及其附属医院抽取674人进行调查,分析该量表的信效度。结果通过探索性因子分析提取4个因子,共包括24个项目,主要拟合指标良好(χ^2/df=1.54、RMSEA=0.04、CFI=0.95、IFI=0.95、TLI=0.94、GFI=0.92),收敛效度和区分效度良好(4个维度的平均方差萃取量分别为0.32、0.44、0.38、0.42,组合信度分别为0.76、0.88、0.70、0.68,4个维度平均方差萃取量的平方根均大于各维度之间的相关系数的绝对值),总量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.87,各维度的Cronbach's α系数在0.63~0.84之间,分半信度为0.77,各维度分半信度为0.66~0.80。结论中医药健康素养量表具有良好的信度和效度,是一种有效可行的测量工具。 Objective To develop an instrument for measuring the health literacy in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)and test its reliability and validity.Methods The draft of health literacy scale in TCM was developed.A sample of 674 people were investigated from two hospitals and affiliated universities by using convenience sampling to analyzethe validity and reliability of this scale.Results Four factor were obtained by exploratory factor analysis,which included 24 items.The main fitting index was good(χ^2/df=1.54,RMSEA=0.04,CFI=0.95,IFI=0.95,TLI=0.94,GFI=0.92).Convergent validity and discriminant validity were good.(AVE of four dimensions were 0.32,0.44,0.38,0.42.CR was 0.76,0.88,0.70,0.68,and the square root of AVE of the four dimensions was larger than the absolute value of the correlation coefficient of each dimension.)The Cronbach's α coefficient of total scale was 0.87.The Cronbach's α coefficients of each dimensions were 0.63~0.84.The split-half reliability of total scale was 0.77.The split-half reliability of each dimensions was 0.66~0.80.Conclusion The health literacy in TCM has good reliability and validity,which is an effective and feasible measuring tool.
作者 彭妤 周熙临 毛惠梨 胡荣婷 谢静涛 PENG Yu;ZHOU Xilin;MAO Huili;HU Rongting;XIE Jingtao(School of Humanities and Management,Hunan University of Chinese Medicine,Changsha,Hunan 410208,China;Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518033,China)
出处 《湖南中医药大学学报》 CAS 2020年第11期1437-1440,共4页 Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine
基金 广东省中医药局科研项目(20191278) 深圳市科技计划项目(20160138)。
关键词 健康素养 中医药 量表 信度 效度 health literacy traditional Chinese medicine reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献31

  • 1曾五一,黄炳艺.调查问卷的可信度和有效度分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2005,20(6):11-15. 被引量:359
  • 2雷雳,柳铭心.青少年的人格特征与互联网社交服务使用偏好的关系[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):797-802. 被引量:77
  • 3Etter, J. F. , & Perneger, T. V. (1999). Associations between the stages of change and the pros and cons of smoking in a longitudinal study of swiss smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 24 (3) , 419 - 424. 被引量:1
  • 4Eva, V.L., Edie, R.H., & Nadine, P.C. (2008). Transtheoretical model of health behavior change applied to voice therapy. Journal of Voice, 22 ( 6 ) ,688 - 698. 被引量:1
  • 5Hall, A. S., & Parsons, J. (2001). Internet addiction: College student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 23 (4) , 312 - 327. 被引量:1
  • 6Jong - Un Kim. (2007). A Reality Therapy Group Counseling Program as An Intemet Addiction Recovery Method for College Students in Korea. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 26 ( 2 ) ,3 - 10. 被引量:1
  • 7LaBrie, J. W., Pedersen, E. R., Earleywine, M., & Olsen, H. (2006). Reducing heavy drinking in college males with the decisional balance: Analyzing an element of Motivational Interviewing. Addictive Behaviors, 31 ( 2 ) ,254 - 263. 被引量:1
  • 8Lauby, J. L., Bond, L., Eroglu, D., & Batson, H. (2006). Decisional Balance, Perceived Risk and HIV Testing Practices". AIDS and Behavior, 1,83 -92. 被引量:1
  • 9Mann, H. H. (2006). Demographic, Habitual, and Socioeconomic Determinants of Interact addiction Disorder: An Empirical Study of Korean Teenagers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5) ,514 - 527. 被引量:1
  • 10Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change ( 2nd ed. ). New York : The Guilford Press. 被引量:1

共引文献89

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部