期刊文献+

“表演”支配对象的历时考察及其相关问题研究

A diachronic investigation of dominating object of"Biaoyan"(表演)and its related issues
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "表演"连用当不晚于清代出现,从其所支配对象的历时考察来看,与其匹配的对象多为情节、技艺、技巧等,其目的主要为供人观赏,强调的是给人视觉上的感知。而"唱歌"的目的则主要为供人欣赏,强调的是给人听觉上的感知,所以目的性要素的不相融是制约二者在语义上不能匹配的关键因素。且从优选论的角度来看,"表演"倾向于选择体词性成分充当宾语,而"唱歌"属于谓词性成分,所以句法成分的不兼容也是制约二者不能匹配的原因之一。从实际语例来看,"唱歌"与"表演"应该是一种并列关系而非支配关系。 The combination of "Biaoyan"(表演)occurred no later than Qing Dynasty.According to the diachronic investigation of its combination,most of the matched objects are plots,techniques and skills,etc.Its main purpose is to watch and its emphasis is on visual perception for people.But the main purpose of "Changge"(唱歌)is to enjoy and its emphasis is on auditory perception for people.Therefore,the incompatibility of teleological elements is the key factor that restricts the semantic incompatibility.From the perspective of optimality theory,"Biaoyan"(表演)tends to choose the substantive as its object,but "Changge"(唱歌)belongs to the predicate component,so the incompatibility of syntactic components is also one of the reasons that restrict the two from matching.From the perspective of practical use cases, "Changge"(唱歌)and "Biaoyan"(表演)should be a kind of co-ordinating relation rather than government relation.
作者 孙淑娟 SUN Shujuan(School of Humanities and Arts,Nanchang Institute of Technology,Nanchang 330099,China)
出处 《南昌工程学院学报》 CAS 2020年第5期74-78,共5页 Journal of Nanchang Institute of Technology
基金 江西省高校人文社会科学规划项目(YY18103)。
关键词 表演 支配对象 语义关联 优选性成分 历时考察 “Biaoyan”(表演) dominating object semantic association optimality ingredients diachronic investigation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献11

  • 1蒋绍愚.打击义动词的词义分析[J].中国语文,2007(5):387-401. 被引量:66
  • 2王凤阳.2011.《古辞辨》(增订本),北京:中华书局. 被引量:4
  • 3贾燕子.2012.《上位化:概念域的历时演变与强势上位词的衍生》,南京大学博士学位论文. 被引量:1
  • 4Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse 2004 Cognitive Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 5Cruse, D. Alan 2002 Hyponymy and its Varieties. The Semantics of Relationsbips: an Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. Rebecca Green, Carol A. Bean and Sung Hyon Myaeng, 3-21. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 被引量:1
  • 6Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green 2006 Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. 被引量:1
  • 7Geeraerts, Dirk 2006 Theories of LexicalSemantics, New York: Oxford University Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Geeraerts, Dirk 2010 Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Reading. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 被引量:1
  • 9Murphy, Gregory L. and Mary E. Lassaline 1997 Hierarchical Structure in Concepts and the Basic Level of Categorization. Knowledge, concepts and categories, ed. Koen Lamberts and David Shanks, 93-132. Hove: Psychology Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Tuggy, David 1993 Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics (4). 被引量:1

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部