摘要
建设部(已撤销)与财政部联合印发的《建设工程质量保证金管理办法》(建质〔2017〕138号)虽已明确质量保证金与保修期并无直接关系,仅与缺陷责任期进行对应,但在近年来的社会实践中,质量保证金仍因预留比例不合理、返还期限难以确定等相关权利义务的约定不明(或未约定)而引发纠纷,客观上加剧了承、发包双方的矛盾。因此,在社会实践中如何规避承、发包双方之间的法律纠纷,合理有效的应用质量保证金仍待进一步探讨。
The Measures for the Administration of Quality Guarantee Deposit for Construction Projects(JZ[2017]No.138)jointly issued by the Ministry of Construction(cancelled)and the Ministry of Finance has made it clear that the quality guarantee deposit has no direct relationship with the warranty period,and only corresponds to the defect liability period.However,in recent years,the social practice reveals that the quality guarantee deposit still causes disputes due to the unclear(or unagreed)rights and obligations,such as unreasonable reserved proportion and difficulty in determining the return period,aggravating the contradiction between contractor and employer objectively.Therefore,to avoid the legal disputes between contractor and employer in social practice,the reasonable and effective application of quality guarantee deposit still needs to be further discussed.
作者
宋歌
孙梦莎
刘全
吴朝晖
张红珍
Song Ge;Sun Mengsha;Liu Quan;Wu Zhaohui;Zhang Hongzhen(GD Power Development Co.,Ltd.Legal Affairs and Information Management Department,Beijing,100101)
出处
《能源科技》
2020年第10期14-17,42,共5页
Energy Science and Technology
关键词
建设工程
质量保证金
缺陷责任期
质量保修期
工程质量
construction project
quality guarantee deposit
defect liability period
warranty period
project quality
