期刊文献+

振幅整合脑电图联合全面无反应性量表对意识障碍患儿预后的评价 被引量:5

Value of amplitude-integrated EEG combined with Full Outline of Unresponsiveness in evaluating the prognosis of children with disturbance of consciousness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究振幅整合脑电图(aEEG)、全面无反应性量表(FOUR)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)对儿童重症监护室(PICU)意识障碍患儿的预后评价作用。方法选择苏州大学附属儿童医院PICU 164例意识障碍患儿为研究对象,根据预后分为预后不良组(n=111)和预后良好组(n=53)。收集两组患儿入院第1天及第5天的aEEG、FOUR及GCS结果,分析不同评估方法与预后之间的关系,采用受试者工作特征曲线评估a EEG、FOUR、GCS对预后的预测作用。结果第5天aEEG无改善或异常程度加重者,预后较差。aEEG与预后呈正相关(r=0.698,P<0.001),FOUR、GCS与预后呈负相关(分别r=-0.655、-0.554,P<0.001)。aEEG、FOUR、GCS的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.894、0.903、0.840,3者的AUC差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);a EEG联合FOUR的AUC为0.945,高于各单项指标预测的AUC(P<0.05)。结论aEEG及FOUR均可作为预测意识障碍患儿预后的有效工具,二者联合应用可提高预测价值。[中国当代儿科杂志,2020,22(11):1183-1187] Objective To study the value of amplitude-integrated EEG(aEEG),Full Outline of Unresponsiveness(FOUR),and Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS)in evaluating the prognosis of children with disturbance of consciousness in the pediatric intensive care unit(PICU).Methods A total of 164 children with disturbance of consciousness who were admitted to the PICU of Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University were enrolled as subjects.According to prognosis,they were divided into a poor prognosis group with 111 children and a good prognosis group with 53 children.The results of aEEG monitoring,FOUR score,and GCS score on days 1 and 5 of admission were collected.The association between evaluation methods and prognosis was analyzed.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the value of aEEG,FOUR,and GCS in predicting prognosis.Results The children with no improvement or abnormal aggravation of aEEG on day 5 tended to have a poor prognosis.The results of aEEG was positively correlated with prognosis(r=0.689,P<0.001),and FOUR and GCS were negatively correlated with prognosis(r=-0.655 and-0.554 respectively,P<0.001).The areas under the ROC curve(AUC)of aEEG,FOUR,and GCS were 0.894,0.903,and 0.840 respectively,and there was no significant difference in the AUC between the three indices(P>0.05),while aEEG combined with FOUR had an AUC of 0.945,which was significantly larger than that of each index alone(P<0.05).Conclusions Both aEEG and FOUR can be used as effective tools to predict the prognosis of children with disturbance of consciousness,and a combination of aEEG and FOUR can improve the predictive value.[Chin J Contemp Pediatr,2020,22(11):1183-1187]
作者 朱玲 柏振江 李莺 ZHU Ling;BAI Zhen-Jiang;LI Ying(Pediatric Intensive Care Unit,Children's Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu 215000,China)
出处 《中国当代儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第11期1183-1187,共5页 Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
关键词 意识障碍 振幅整合脑电图 全面无反应性量表 格拉斯哥昏迷评分 预后 儿童 Disturbance of consciousness Amplitude-integrated EEG Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Glasgow Coma Scale Prognosis Child
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献28

  • 1Teasdale G,Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness.A practical scale[J].The Lancet,1974,(7872):81-84. 被引量:1
  • 2Rowlands HE,Morris KP. Management of severe traumatic brain injury[J].Paediatr & Chil Health,2007,(03):82-88. 被引量:1
  • 3Bowkera R,Stephenson T. The management of children presenting with decreased conscious level[J].Curren Paediatr,2006,(07):328-335. 被引量:1
  • 4Kan CH,Saffari M,Khoo TH. Prognostic factors of severe traumatic brain injury outcome in children aged 2-16 years at a major neurosurgical referral centre[J].Malays J Med Sci,2009,(04):25-33. 被引量:1
  • 5Rowley G,Fielding K. Reliability and accuracy of the Glasgow Coma Scale with experienced and inexperienced users[J].The Lancet,1991,(8740):535-538. 被引量:1
  • 6Balestreri M,Czosnyka M,Chatfield DA. Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma:change in trend over the past ten years[J].Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry,2004,(01):161-162. 被引量:1
  • 7Diringer MN,Edwards DF. Does modification of the Innsbruck and the Glasgow Coma Scales improve their ability to predict functional outcome[J].Archives of Neurology,1997,(05):606-611. 被引量:1
  • 8Giannoni C,Chelazzi C,Villa G. Organ dysfunction scores in ICU[J].Trends in Anaesthesia & Crit Care,2013,(03):89-96. 被引量:1
  • 9Kelly CA,Upex A,Bateman DN. Comparison of consciousness level assessment in the poisoned patient using the alert/verbal/painful/unresponsive scale and the Glasgow Coma Scale[J].Annals of Emergency Medicine,2004,(02):108-113. 被引量:1
  • 10McNarry AF,Goldhill DR. Simple bedside assessment of level of consciousness:comparison of two simple assessment scales with the Glasgow Coma scale[J].Anaesthesia,2004,(01):34-37. 被引量:1

共引文献42

同被引文献73

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部