期刊文献+

不同生态技术防护方案边坡的稳定性分析 被引量:6

Stability analysis of slopes with different ecological technology protection schemes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以重庆铁路枢纽东环线某生态护坡技术示范工程为例,利用Midas GTS/NX有限元软件建立了灌草护坡方案、矮墙—灌草护坡方案、格构锚杆—灌草护坡方案的数值模型并对3种不同护坡方案进行了稳定性分析。结果表明:灌草护坡方案使边坡土体的潜在滑动区域变深,塑性区域变小;格构锚杆—灌草联合护坡时,边坡的安全系数最大;矮墙—灌草联合护坡的安全系数比灌草护坡的安全系数略大。 Taking a demonstration project of ecological slope protection technology on the East Ring Line of Chongqing Railway Hub as an example,the Midas GTS/NX finite element software is used to establish the numerical values of grass-filling slope protection scheme,low wall-grass-filling slope protection scheme,lattice anchor-grass-filling slope protection scheme.The model and stability analysis of three different slope protection schemes are carried out.The results show that:the shrub-grass slope protection scheme makes the potential sliding area of the slope soil deeper and the plastic area smaller;the safety factor of the slope is the largest when the lattice anchor-shrub and grass combined slope protection;the safety factor of the low wall-shrub and grass combined slope protection is not much different from that of the shrub and grass slope protection.
作者 喻雷 王聚山 杨慧 江学良 范文臣 李珍玉 Yu Lei;Wang Jushan;Yang Hui;Jiang Xueliang;Fan Wenchen;Li Zhenyu(Civil Engineering College,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,China;Chongqing Railway Hub East Loop Construction Headquarters,China Railway Chengdu Bureau Group Co Ltd,Chengdu 610082,China)
出处 《湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2020年第4期87-93,共7页 Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31971727) 中铁二十局集团公司科技研发项目(YF1900SD07B) 湖南省自然科学基金资助项目(2020JJ4944) 2018年湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(18A162)。
关键词 铁路边坡 灌草护坡 矮墙—灌草护坡 格构锚杆—灌草护坡 边坡稳定性 railway slope shrub-filled slope protection low wall-shrub grass slope protection lattice anchor-shrub irrigation slope protection slope stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献44

共引文献105

同被引文献33

引证文献6

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部