期刊文献+

论值班律师参与量刑建议的协商 被引量:5

Discussion on Duty Lawyer Participation in the Negotiation of Sentencing Proposal
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究值班律师必须立足于我国的国情。在认罪认罚从宽的案件中,值班律师负有特殊的职责,2018年修改后的《刑事诉讼法》增加了值班律师对案件处理提出意见等内容。在认罪认罚从宽案件中值班律师履行的是最低限度的辩护服务,值班律师应实质性地参与量刑建议的形成。在认罪认罚案件中量刑建议的形成是控辩双方的合意,量刑建议的预判性要得到裁判的保障。为了值班律师能够有效地参与、对量刑建议的形成产生实质影响,值班律师必须以会见和阅卷为基础,保障量刑建议形成过程公开与透明,争取检察官作出确定刑的建议。值班律师与被追诉人之间应形成委托关系,设立量刑协商程序,并完善程序性制裁。 Research on duty lawyers must be based on China’s national condition.In cases involving lenient punishment,duty lawyers have special responsibilities.The"Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China(2018 Amendment)"empowered duty lawyers to share opinions on how to handle cases with lenient punishment.In those cases,duty lawyers perform the minimum defense services.They should substantially participate in the formation of sentencing recommendations.The final version of sentencing recommendations in the cases pleading guilty are a consensus between the prosecutor and the defendant,which means the predictability of the sentencing recommendations must be guaranteed by courts.To guarantee the effective participation and substantial impact of the duty lawyers,they must conduct reviews and interviews of cases to ensure the process of forming sentencing recommendations is open and transparent,and strive for a precise recommendation.Procedural guarantees are necessary,that is,the entrusting relationship between the duty lawyer and the person being prosecuted,the establishment of sentencing negotiation procedures,and the improvement of procedural sanctions.
作者 程滔 于超 Cheng Tao;Yu Chao
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第11期111-120,共10页 Law Science Magazine
关键词 值班律师 量刑建议 认罪认罚从宽 量刑协商程序 duty lawyer sentencing recommendation lenient punishments on those confessing to their crimes and accepting punishments in criminal cases negotiation procedure between the prosecution and the defense
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献51

共引文献307

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部