摘要
格式条款的法律规制是一个从"形式——实体",从"程序——内容",从"订立——效力",全方位覆盖的缜密逻辑体系。然而现行法律对网络消费者合同中格式管辖条款的规制粗疏、零散,造成实践中司法适用路径的分歧,包括法律规范的混合适用和缺漏适用。主要存在应否进行实体审查,实体审查时是否深入管辖合意的内容公平性,法律规制顺位如何,三个维度的问题,学界亟需予以回应。从管辖协议和格式化特性的双重视角,均应对网络消费格式管辖条款进行实体规制。在实体规制的对象维度,应审查格式管辖协议的合同相对性、信息提示合理性及内容公平性。在法律规制的顺位维度,应首先运用程序法要件进行形式合法性审查,其次适用合同相对性原理,再次采用信息规制,最后进行内容控制。严格按此顺位进行法律构造,既保证程序正义,又致力于实体正义的实现。
The legal regulation of standard clauses is a meticulous logic system covering all aspects from"form-entity",from"procedure-conten",from"conclusioneffectiveness".However,the current law’s regulation of formal jurisdiction clauses in online consumer contracts is sparse and scattered,resulting in differences in judicial application paths in practice,including mixed application and missing application of legal norms.There are mainly three dimensions of questions:whether to carry out entity review,whether to have in-depth jurisdiction over the content fairness of the agreement,the sequence of legal regulation and so on.Academic circles urgently need to respond to these questions.In the object dimension of entity regulation,the contract relativity,rationality of information prompt and fairness of content of format jurisdiction agreement should be reviewed.In the order dimension of legal regulation,we should first use procedural law elements to review formal legality,secondly apply the principle of contract relativity,thirdly use information regulation,and finally control content.According to this sequence,the legal structure is strictly carried out,which not only guarantees procedural justice,but also devotes itself to the realization of substantive justice.
作者
胡安琪
李明发
HU An-qi;LI Ming-fa(School of Public Policy&M anagem ent,A nhui Jianzhu U niversity,Hefei 230601;School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,China)
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第11期102-117,共16页
Hebei Law Science
基金
安徽建筑大学科研基金资助(2019QDR10)。
关键词
网络消费者合同
格式管辖条款
管辖协议
实体规制
online consumer contract
standard jurisdiction clause
agreement on jurisdiction
substantive regulation
