摘要
近代政治哲学的转向使政治建构从神学的视域下解放出来,获得了自身的独立性。由此,财产权作为人格自由的表征在近现代政治哲学中便占有着愈发重要的位置,但随之也产生了一个问题,即我们是如何获得对财产的占有的。在对财产权何以可能的这一根本性问题的回答中,洛克、康德和黑格尔的解释起着支配性作用,而且他们的思路呈现为一个在逻辑上有递进关系的表现形式:从洛克以劳动为中介的经验性占有过渡到康德以普遍意志所确立起来的理智的占有,再过渡到黑格尔对自由的思辨性理解所表现出的直接性占有。这个颇具正、反、合的发展理路使财产权由近代的自然法或自然状态的经验性视域转移到德国哲学的先验视域中去了。这在更高奠基的角度上使近代的政治哲学建构有了更深入的发展。
The turning point of modern political philosophy makes itself liberated from theology and becomes independent.Thus property right as expression of freedom of a person plays a more important role in modern-contemporary political philosophy.But the problem that how we obtain the possession of property comes up accordingly.Among the answers to the fundamental problem of how property right is possible,the explanations of Locke,Kant and Hegel play a dominant role and take the form of progressive association in logic.It changes from Locke’s empirical possession through labour to Kant’s intelligible possession through the general will,and to Hegel’s immediate existence of will through the speculative explanation of freedom.This route which includes thesis-antithesis-synthesis transfers property right from the empirical perspective of modern natural law or natural state to a prior perspective of German philosophy.This makes modern political philosophy further develop in the view of its higher foundation.
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第6期197-205,236,共10页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(17JJD720003)
吉林大学基本科研项目(2016ZZ008)。
关键词
财产权
洛克
康德
黑格尔
劳动
自由
property right
Locke
Kant
Hegel
labour
liberty
