摘要
让与担保作为一种非典型担保在企业融资中扮演着重要角色,从其产生之日起,其效力问题就一直存在着争论。在债权债务关系中,双方以担保为目的,由债务人或第三人向债权人移转担保物的所有权,此后在债务人如实清偿的情况下再将所有权转移给原所有权人,否则债权人可行使担保权能。文章以最高人民法院发布的典型案例为导入,分析我国司法中逐渐形成的认可让与担保效力的审判模式,以及让与担保权人在破产程序中通过优先受偿权实现担保权的路径。事实上,让与担保权人优先受偿权的行使以享有物权效力为基础,并且要避开破产撤销权的阻隔。
As an atypical guarantee,transferring guarantee plays an important role in enterprise financing.Since its emergence,its effectiveness has been debated.The number of cases related to transferring guarantee of the bankruptcy procedure is also increasing year by year from China,and the judicial mode of confirming the effectiveness of transferring guarantee of the absence of other invalid causes is gradually formed into China.In the context of bankruptcy,the authorized transferee can have priority to the payment of the security,which is more in line with the value function of the transferee.However,the exercise in the right should be based on the effect of real right,and avoid the barrier of the right of bankruptcy revocation.
出处
《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第5期23-30,共8页
Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
关键词
破产程序
让与担保
取回权
优先受偿权
破产撤销权
bankruptcy proceeding
transferring guarantee
recall right
the priority right of compensation
right of revocation
