摘要
分析基于理论变迁分别对应于三种理论范式的命令规制、激励规制、协商规制的理论内涵,并从成本收益视角对三种规制类型进行比较研究。通过分析发现:任何一种环境规制类型都不能独立解决环境问题,需充分发挥主体多元协同性及手段综合互补性以建立融合规制体系。促进政府角色转型,聚焦平台保障和政策兜底,通过适当的激励和协商,利用软标准和多主体参与监督等制约因素,激发市场主体间的监督和正向激励作用,以引导宽松、自由选择的良性政策环境出现。
Based on the theoretical changes of the three paradigms corresponding respectively to the means of command regulation,incentive regulation,negotiation regulation,their theoretical connotations are analyzed,and from the perspective of cost-benefit efficiency,the three types of regulation are studied comparatively.Through analysis,it is found that no type of environmental regulation can solve environmental problems independently,and a full application of multi-agent cooperation and comprehensive complementarity of approaches are required to establish the integrated regulatory system.The transformation of the government′s role should be promoted,and platform guarantees and policy coverage should be focused on.And supervision and positive incentives among market entities are stimulated through appropriate incentives and consultations as well as by soft standards and the constraints of multi-subject participation so as to guide the emergence of a benign policy environment for loose and free choice.
作者
周元松
ZHOU Yuansong(Peking University Law School, Beijing 100871, China)
出处
《洛阳理工学院学报（社会科学版）》
2020年第5期43-47,共5页
Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition
关键词
环境风险规制
命令型规制
激励型规制
协商型规制
融合规制体系
environmental risk regulation
commanding regulation
incentive regulation
negotiation regulation
integrated regulation system
