摘要
当代西方文化记忆研究从20世纪20年代延续至今,它的跨学科性和跨时空性受到学者的广泛关注,成果斐然。本着返璞归真的原则,从西方文化记忆研究的源流入手,探讨了莫里斯·哈布瓦赫关于集体记忆的研究及其开创作用,回顾了皮埃尔·诺拉的“记忆之场”以及后续学者对文化记忆研究的扩展。尝试在阿斯特莉特·埃尔对文化记忆分类研究的基础上提出文化记忆与主体、文化记忆与客体、文化记忆与方法的分类模式。在此基础上,指出西方文化记忆研究的不足,同时比较国内文化记忆研究,提出今后国内文化记忆研究应在跨学科、本土化、定量研究上下功夫。
Cultural memory studies started in the 1920s,and its interdisciplinary and spatio-temporal nature attracted many scholars who have done fruitful research up to today.With an initiative focus on the origin of western cultural memory studies,this paper discusses Maurice Halbwachs’theory of collective memory and its pioneering role,and reviews Pierre Nora’s“sites of memory”as well as the subsequent research of other scholars.Based on Astrid Erll's research on classification of cultural memory,this paper tries to put forward the classification models of cultural memory and subject,cultural memory and object,and cultural memory and method.On this basis,it points out the shortcomings of the western cultural memory research,compares cultural memory studies in China,and suggests Chinese scholars should focus on interdisciplinary,localization and quantitative research in future.
作者
余宏
YU Hong(The Party School of the CPC Tongling Municipal Committee,Tongling,Anhui 244000)
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2020年第6期25-30,94,共7页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
2018年度安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目“城市记忆视角下的安徽省工业遗产保护和利用”(AHSKQ018D25)。
关键词
集体记忆
记忆之场
文化记忆
主客体
collective memory
sites of memory
cultural memory
subject and object
