摘要
技术哲学在经验转向后面临理论与实践的困境。对此,克洛斯和梅耶斯提出技术哲学的价值论转向。价值论转向具体分为描述性价值论转向和规范性价值论转向。描述性价值论转向在研究目标和进路上与经验转向相一致,可视为经验转向的延续。而采取规范性立场的规范性价值论转向具有颠覆性,并面临休谟问题的挑战。尽管许多技术哲学家赞同并呼吁价值论转向,但这种转向是否可能以及如何实现需要进一步思考。
The philosophy of technology is faced with theoretical and practical questions after the empirical turn. Kroes and Meijers proposed that the next step of the philosophy of technology is an axiological turn. The axiological turn can be divided into a descriptive and normative axiological turn. The descriptive axiological turn is consistent with the empirical turn in both the research goal and approach, which can be seen as the continuation of the empirical turn. The normative axiological turn that takes a normative position is radical and faces the challenge of Hume’s problem. Although many philosophers of technology call for the axiological turn, whether this turn is possible and how to realize it requires further consideration.
作者
贾浩然
夏保华
JIA Hao-ran;XIA Bao-hua(Department of Philosophy&Science,Southeast University,Nanjing 211189,China)
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第9期31-37,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
国家社科基金重大项目(19ZDA040)
国家社科基金项目(16BZX025)
江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(KYCX18_0205)。
关键词
技术哲学
价值论转向
休谟问题
philosophy of technology
axiological turn
Hume’s problem
