期刊文献+

随意殴打型寻衅滋事罪的定罪量刑问题研究——基于50个二审案例样本的分析

Research on Conviction and Penalty Measurement of the Crime of Random Assault and Provocation:An Analysis Based on a Sample of 50 Second-Instance Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随意殴打型寻衅滋事定罪量刑的司法认定存在“随意”的判断标准不明、“公共秩序”法益的认定缺漏等问题,量刑也缺乏统一标准。这些问题背后有立法不够明确、存在“以刑制罪”现象和司法人员对各罪理解不深入、律师辩护不力等原因,需要在明确立法规定的同时,加强司法管理,保证严格遵循犯罪构成要件定罪,参考个案情节科学量刑。 In order to research the conviction and penalty measurement of the crime of random assault and provocation,this article selects 50 second-instance case samples,makes statistical analysis of the specific cause of the case,the place of occurrence,the consequences of injury and the final result of penalty measurement.The result indicates that the crime of random assault and provocation not only has the problems of unclear judging standards of"arbitrary"judgments and lack of determination of legal interests of"public order"in judicial determination,but also lacks uniform standards in penalty measurement.Behind these issues are the reasons for the lack of clarity in legislative provisions,the seriousness of determining a crime by the statutory penalty of the crime,the inadequate understanding of various crimes by judicial personnel,and the ineffective defense of lawyers.In the future there is need to clarify the legislative provisions,strengthen judicial management to ensure strict compliance with the constitutive elements of a crime for convictions and scientific penalty measurement based on the circumstances of individual cases.
作者 许译文 XU Yi-wen(Law School, Beijing University, Beijing 100871, China)
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《湖北职业技术学院学报》 2020年第3期82-88,共7页 Journal of Hubei Polytechnic Institute
关键词 寻衅滋事 随意殴打 社会秩序 量刑标准 affray crime beating others at random social order standards of penalty measurement
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部