摘要
马俊慧、马晽文丽的《对“铸本”的考察:兼及〈聊斋志异〉的成书》主张铸雪斋抄本忠实于殿春亭抄本、殿春亭抄本忠实于底稿、手稿打乱了底稿的篇次、铸雪斋抄本反映了早期稿本即底稿篇次的本来面貌,但经过考察,这四个观点都是错误的。马文还错误地继承白亚仁《夏雪》《化男》随意置于某册之末的观点,因此没有推翻《〈聊斋志异〉编次管窥》一文对册次的划分以及有关编次的结论。
The article On the Printed Copy and the Completing of The Strange Tales of Liaochai by MA Junhui&MA Linwenli advocates that the Zhuxuezhai copy followed faithfully the Dianchunting copy,the latter,the first draft,the manuscript disturbed the the order of arrangement of the book,and the Zhuxuezhai copy reflects the original looks of the book.But the four viewpoints,after examination,are proved to be all wrong.Aditionally,the viewpoint about Xiaxue and Huanan was failed to overthrow the order of arrangement of the book that my article divided.
作者
郑子运
ZHENG Zi-yun(Guizhou Academy of Social Science,guiyang 550002,China)
出处
《蒲松龄研究》
2020年第3期133-142,共10页
Study on Pu Songling
关键词
聊斋志异
铸雪斋抄本
手稿
编次
The Strange Tales of Liaochai
the Zhuxuezhai copy
first draft
the order of arrangement
