摘要
依据词典的标注来确定动词的自他是非常普遍的做法,然而实际上词典之间的自他标注存在一定差异。本文以“单纯ヲ格共现标准”为理论依据,通过语料库调查和母语者调查,在描写主动态动词配价结构的基础上,确定了三部词典标注不一致的81个二字汉语ヲ变动词的自他属性,并分析了本文同三部词典的自他认定的差异及原因。本文和三部词典的主要差异在于自他两用动词的认定,主要原因是配价观察是否充分。
It is a very normal practice to confirm the transitive and intransitive verbs according to the annotations of dictionaries,however,there are obviously different annotations of the transitive and intransitive verbs among dictionaries.This paper conducted a corpus search and a survey of native speakers based on Pure Wo-case Cooccurrence Standard theory.It confirmed the attributes of 81 transitive and Intransitive SaHen verbal nouns of two-Chinese-character words in three dictionaries and analyzed the differences and the reasons of the affirmations.The major difference between this paper and the three dictionaries lies on the affirmation of both the transitive and intransitive verbs,and the main reason to the difference is whether the valance observations are sufficient or not.
出处
《东北亚外语研究》
2020年第3期47-55,共9页
Foreign Language Research in Northeast Asia
基金
河南理工大学2018年度博士基金(人文社科类)项目“基于语料库的中日同形词基本词汇研究”(SKB2018-04)的阶段性成果。
关键词
二字汉语サ变动词
自他
配价
差异
原因
SaHen verbal nouns of two-Chinese-character words
transitive and intransitive
valances
differences
reasons
