期刊文献+

美洛西林钠/舒巴坦钠治疗急性细菌性感染疾病的多中心临床研究 被引量:4

A Multicentre Clinical Trial on Mezlocillin/Sulbactam for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价美洛西林钠/舒巴坦钠治疗急性细菌性感染疾病的安全性、有效性及药物不良反应。方法:本研究采用多中心随机对照的方法,比较研究了国产美洛西林钠/舒巴坦钠每次3.75g、每12h或8h 1次,与替卡西林/克拉维酸每次3.2g、每12h或8h1次应用治疗急性细菌性感染的临床疗效和安全性。结果:试验组的痊愈率和有效率分别为76.36%和99.09%,细菌清除率为92.78%;对照组的痊愈率和有效率分别为62.24%和88.78%,细菌清除率为91.95%,两组差异无统计学意义。试验中未发现应用美洛西林钠/舒巴坦钠的严重药物不良反应。结论:国产美洛西林钠/舒巴坦钠对急性细菌性感染的临床疗效较好而不良反应较少。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safty and adverse drug reaction of mezlocillin/sulbactam for acute bacterial infections. METHODS: A randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial on efficacy and safety of domestic mezlocillin/sulbactam in 3.75g every 8 hours(or 12 hours) compared with timentin in 3.2g every 8 hours(or 12 hours) for treatment of acute bacterial infections was conducted. RESULTS: The results showed that the the cure rates and efficacy rates in the test group were 76.36% and 99.09%, the bacterial clearance rate was 92.78%, while the cure rates and efficacy rates in the control group were 62.24% and 88.78%, and the bacterial clearance rate was 91.95%, the differerence between the two groups was no statistically significant. There were no serious adverse drug reactions of mezlocillin/sulbactam in the clinical trial. CONCLUSION: It suggested that mezlocillin/sulbactam is an effective and safe drug for treatment acute bacterial infections.
出处 《中国临床药理学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2000年第5期327-331,共5页 The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1Yang Y,Pharmacol Ther,1999年,83卷,141页 被引量:1

同被引文献31

  • 1程颖,陶建凤,庄寅,余红.儿童重症渗出性多形红斑32例临床分析[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,2006,20(5):281-282. 被引量:7
  • 2周琼 张竣 等.注射用美洛西林钠致不良反应4例[J].中国临床药学杂志,1999,8(5):322-322. 被引量:6
  • 3[2]George M. Eliopoulos,Robert C. Moellering. Azlocillin,Mezlocillin, and Piperacillin: new broad-spectrum penicillins.Annals of Intenal Medicine. 1982,97 : 755-760. 被引量:1
  • 4[7]Laura J V. Piddock,YU Fang Jin, HL. Turner. Activity of 13 β- lactam agents combined WithBRL42715againstp- lactamaseproducingGram- negativebacteriacomparedto combinations with clavulanic acid, tazobactam and sulbatam. J Antimicro Chemother. 1993,31: 89- 103. 被引量:1
  • 5[8]Wildfeuer-A,Schmalreck- A,Rader-K,et al. Studies on the synergism of sulbactam and - lactam antibiotics underin Vitro conditions andin healthy volunteers after intravenous administration. Drug Res. 1989,39(1):94-100. 被引量:1
  • 6[9]Schmalreck AF, Wildfeuer A. In vitro activity against Clinically important gram - positve andgram - negativebacteria of Sulbactam, alone andincombination With ampicillin, cefotaxime, mezlocillin, andpiperacillin. Arzneimittelforschung.1990,40(10) : 1145 - 1155. 被引量:1
  • 7[10]Manncke K, Springsklee M, Heizmann WR, et al. SUlbactam incombinationwithmezlocillin, piperacillin Orcefotaxime.Clinical and hacteriological resultS in the treatment of severe bacterial ifections. Med - Klin, 1991,15; 86 (9): 454- 460. 被引量:1
  • 8[11]Bauemfeind- A, Grimm- H, Klietmann-W, et al. The effect of SUlbactam on the in Vitroactivity Of mezlocillin,piperacillin,and cefotaxime. Arzneimittelforschung. 1991; 41(8) :831 - 831. 被引量:1
  • 9[15]Verbist L, Tjandramaga TB, VerbessehR,et al. Mezlocillin Pharmacokinetics. Drug-Rse, 1979,29(Ⅱ):1962-1966. 被引量:1
  • 10[16]RobdeB, Wemer u, Hickstein H,et al. Pharmacokinetics of mezlocillin and sulbactam under continuous veno- venous hemodialysis(CVVHI))in intensive care patients with acute renal failure J Clin Pharmacol, 1997,53:111-115. 被引量:1

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部