期刊文献+

疤痕子宫再次妊娠分娩方式的选择及经阴道分娩安全性的临床研究 被引量:9

Clinical Study on the Choice of Delivery Mode and the Safety of Transvaginal Delivery in the Second Pregnancy of Scarred Uterus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨疤痕子宫再次妊娠对分娩方式的选择以及经阴道分娩的安全性影响。方法:选用2016年6月~2019年6月某院收治的60例疤痕子宫再次妊娠产妇随机分为对照组和观察组各30例,对照组选择剖宫产,观察组选择阴道分娩,对比两组的分娩结局,分析疤痕子宫再次妊娠经阴道分娩的安全性。结果:与对照组比较,观察组总产程时间较长,出血量较少,住院时间较短,组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但并发症方面比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组在新生儿体质量、Apgar评分等新生儿结局比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:疤痕子宫再次妊娠产妇应谨慎选择分娩方式,若符合阴道分娩指征,可先行阴道试产,在此过程中需密切监测产程变化,才能有效提高经阴道分娩的安全性。 Objective:To explore the effect of scarred uterus pregnancy on the choice of delivery mode and the safety of transvaginal delivery.Methods:60 pregnant women with scarred uterus treated in a hospital from June 2016 to June 2019 were selected and randomly divided into control group(30 cases,caesarean section)and observation group(30 cases,transvaginal delivery).The results of delivery were compared between the two groups,and the safety of transvaginal delivery was analyzed.Results:Compared with the control group,the observation group had a long time of labor,less bleeding,and a short time of hospitalization.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in complications(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in neonatal outcome such as neonatal body quality and Apgar score between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Scarred uterus pregnant women should carefully choose the mode of delivery,if the indications of vaginal delivery are met,vaginal trial production can be carried out first.In this process,it is necessary to closely monitor the changes in the course of delivery,in order to effectively improve the safety of transvaginal delivery.
作者 刘艳秋 Liu Yanqiu(Department of Gynecology,Pingqiao Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Xinyang City,Henan Province,Xinyang 464100)
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2020年第10期1463-1464,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 疤痕子宫 分娩方式 阴道分娩 安全性 scar uterus mode of delivery vaginal delivery safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献58

  • 1King TL. Can a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be a normal labor and birth? Lessons from midwifery applied to trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2011,38 (2) : 247 -263. 被引量:1
  • 2Kelly BA,Bright P, Mackenzie IZ. Does the surgical ap- proach used for myomectomy influence the morbidity in subsequent pregnancy? [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol,2008,28 (1):77-81. 被引量:1
  • 3Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections(VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat(third)caesarean sections[J]. B JOG,2010,117(1):5-19. 被引量:1
  • 4Fitzpatrick KE,Kurinczuk JJ,Alfirevic Z,et al. Uterine rupture by intended mode of delivery in the UK:a national case-control study[J]. PLoS Med,2012,9(3):e1001184. 被引量:1
  • 5Bujold E,Goyet M,Marcoux S,et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010,116(1) :43-50. 被引量:1
  • 6Roberge S,Chaillet N,Boutin A,et al. Single-versus dou- ble-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during ce- sarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture [J]. Int J Gy- naecol Obstet, 2011,115 ( 1 ) : 5-10. 被引量:1
  • 7Hesselman S,Hogberg U,Ekholm-Selling K,et al. The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- com- pared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study [J]. BJOG,2015,122(11):1535-1541. 被引量:1
  • 8Uharcek P,Brestansk A,Ravinger J,et al. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015,292(3) : 609-612. 被引量:1
  • 9李学和,郭旻华,金博弘,陈梅,费婉燕.B超检测妊娠晚期子宫下段瘢痕厚度对再次剖宫产的意义[J].实用妇产科杂志,2008,24(9):568-569. 被引量:71
  • 10王花花.疤痕子宫再次足月妊娠的分娩方式探讨[J].海南医学,2010,21(16):85-86. 被引量:26

共引文献78

同被引文献74

引证文献9

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部