期刊文献+

减孔和常规多孔腹腔镜手术治疗结肠癌近期疗效比较 被引量:3

Comparison of short-term efficacy of reduced-port and conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较减孔腹腔镜手术(RPS)和常规多孔腹腔镜手术(MPS)治疗结肠癌的近期疗效。方法研究对象为2014年1月至2018年12月在我院治疗的190例结肠癌患者。治疗采用腹腔镜前切除术(AR)144例或右半结肠切除术(RHC)46例。比较AR及RHC手术中采用RPS或MPS治疗患者的短期疗效。结果在AR中,与行MPS 72例患者相比,RPS 72例患者手术时间短[(114±28)min与(126±35)min,P=0.024],气道通畅时间长[(3.6±1.7)d与(2.5±1.4)d, (P<0.01)]。在RHC中,行RPS患者(23例)手术时间较MPS (23例)短[(112±26)min与(146±32)min,(P<0.01)]。结论与MPS治疗结肠癌相比,RPS的短期疗效是可接受的。 Objective To compare the short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery(RPS)and multiport surgery(MPS)in colon cancer.Methods The subjects were 190 patients with colon cancer treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018.They were divided into laparoscopic anterior resection group(AR)(n=144)and right hemicolectomy group(RHC)(n=46).The short-term effects of RPS or MPS in AR and RHC were compared.Results In the AR,patients who underwent RPS(n=72)showed a shorter operation time[(114±28)min vs.(126±35)min,P=0.024]and a longer time to gas passage[(3.6±1.5)d vs.(2.5±1.4)d,P<0.01]than MPS(n=72).Similarly,in the RHC,the operation time was shorter[(112±26)min vs.(146±32)min,P<0.01].Conclusion The short-term outcomes of RPS were found to be acceptable compared to those of MPS in colon cancer surgery.
作者 任华 Ren Hua(Department of General Surgery,Datong Fifth People′s Hospital,Shanxi 037009,China)
出处 《山西医药杂志》 CAS 2020年第17期2269-2271,共3页 Shanxi Medical Journal
关键词 减孔腹腔镜手术 多孔腹腔镜手术 结肠肿瘤 Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery Multiport laparoscopic surgery Colonic neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon re-section (laparoscopic colectomy ) [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc,1991,1(3) :144-150. 被引量:1
  • 2Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopicatly assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer [ J ]. N Engl J Med,2004,350 (20) :2050-2059. 被引量:1
  • 3Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery ver-sus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a ran-domised trial[ J]. Lancet Oncol,2005 ,6(7) :477-484. 被引量:1
  • 4Gao F, Cao YF, Chen LS. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomesafter laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer [ J ]. Int J ColorectalDis,2006,21(7) :652-656. 被引量:1
  • 5Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomyfor cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data fromthe COST Study Group trial [ J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (4 ) : 655-662 ; discussion 662-664. 被引量:1
  • 6Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al. Randomized trial of lapa-roscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma : 3-year resultsof the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[ J]. J Clin Oncol,2007 ,25?21) :3061-3068. 被引量:1
  • 7Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, et al. Long-term results oflaparoscopic colorectal cancer resection [ J ]. Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev,2008,16(2) :CD003432. 被引量:1
  • 8中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会腹腔镜外科学组.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2008版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2009,12(3):310-312. 被引量:258
  • 9黄世锋,黄顺荣.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的现状与展望[J].中国临床新医学,2009,2(5):470-473. 被引量:4
  • 10郑民华.腹腔镜低位直肠癌根治术[J].中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版),2013,7(2):2-5. 被引量:35

共引文献41

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部