摘要
作为“互联网+算法”运行的产物,推论数据相较于原始数据,正处于被遗忘之地。通过分析经典判例YS·M系列案以及Nowak案可知,推论数据由提供数据与分析数据构成,不仅可通过主体性、独特性、不变性的标准检验可识别性的存在,而且可通过马赛克理论验证数据主体对推论数据确应享有数据权利。但实证研究显示,各数据收集者、数据控制者已将推论数据作为企业数据资产进行利用,不仅在数据收集环节存在提供数据被过度索取的现象,而且在数据处理环节存在分析数据上个人权利被忽视的现象。究其根源,在于立法导向的价值偏差以及既有路径造成的错觉效果。未来我国的个人信息保护立法应避免对欧盟立法的亦步亦趋,坚持“事前预防、多方合作”的数据治理文化,通过保障推论数据获取权以搭建个人数据主体与数据控制者之间的沟通机制,以落实对个人数据权利的全过程动态保护,以真正达到对数据安全与数据流动的兼顾。
As the Output of the running of“internet+algorithm”,the reference data is at the forgotten status compared with the original data.Through analyzing the classic case YS·M and Nowak,we can see that reference data is composed of provided data and analyzed data.About the identifiability of reference data,we can employ the standards of subjectivity,uniqueness and invariance to test,and about the expected data rights on the reference data,we can use mosaic theory to prove.However,empirical research has shown that data collectors and data controllers have already viewed reference data as the data assets of enterprises:in the data collection process,the provided data is excessively demanded;in the data processing process,the analyzed data related data rights are seriously ignored.The root cause lies in the deviation of legislative orientation and the illusions existed paths created.In the future,China s Personal Information Protection Legislation should avoid following the EU legislation at every step,holding“prevent in advance as well as cooperate among parties”as data governance culture,through guaranteeing the right of access to reference data to build communication mechanism between personal data subject and data controller,to realize the dynamic protection of personal data rights in the whole process,and to truly achieve the balance between data security and data flow.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第10期107-118,共12页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“智能合约代码条款的法律转换与风险防控研究”(项目编号:19SFB5014)的阶段性成果。
关键词
推论数据
获取权
数据治理文化
个人信息保护立法
Reference Data
The Right to Access
Data Protection Culture
Personal Information Protection Culture
