期刊文献+

系统评价再评价的数据分析方法及中医药领域的研究现状 被引量:8

Data Analysis Method for Overview of Systematic Reviews and Research Status in the Field of Traditional Chinese Medicine
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着系统评价数量的增多,研究者可以更多地利用二次研究结果全面评价某干预措施或疾病领域证据现状,因此系统评价再评价这一研究类型应运而生。通过全面了解中医药领域系统评价再评价现状,发现目前该领域存在的不足。参考最新Cochrane手册介绍系统评价再评价的制作方法,简要概述系统评价再评价的步骤,重点介绍系统评价再评价与系统评价在选题、纳入及排除标准、研究质量评价方法、数据分析以及证据质量评价方法这几个关键步骤的区别,同时根据研究目的的不同探讨其数据分析的方法,包括原系统评价结果的重现、对原系统评价结果进行分类整理、根据新的研究目的重新进行Meta分析、开展间接比较和网状Meta分析,并介绍纳入的系统评价之间出现重复文献的处理方式,以期为研究者选择恰当的研究方法开展系统评价再评价提供依据。 With the increasing number of systematic reviews, researchers can make more use of the secondary research results to comprehensively evaluate the current status of evidence in a certain intervention or disease field. Therefore, the research type of overviews of systematic review has emerged. Through a comprehensive understanding of the current situation of overviews in the field of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM), the current deficiencies in this field have been discovered. The author refered to the latest Cochrane Handbook to introduce the production method of overviews, briefly outlined the steps of overviews, and focused on the difference of the crucial procedure in the topic selection, inclusion and exclusion criteria, research quality evaluation methods, data analysis and the quality of evidence between overviews and systematic review. Meanwhile, the method of data analysis was discussed according to the different research purposes, including the reproduction of the original system evaluation results, the classification and sorting of the original system evaluation results, and the new meta-analysis, indirect comparison and network Meta-analysis according to the new research purpose. The method to deal with duplicate documents in the included systematic reviews was introduced, in order to provide a basis for researchers to choose appropriate research methods to carry out overviews.
作者 韩梅 刘建平 彭蓉晏 余泽宇 曹卉娟 HAN Mei;LIU Jianping;PENG Rongyan;YU Zeyu;CAO Huijuan(Evidence-Based Medicine Center,Beijing University of Chinese MedicineBeijing,100029;Clinical School of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine)
出处 《中医杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第17期1525-1529,共5页 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(81804000)。
关键词 系统评价再评价 数据分析 中医药方法学 系统评价 overview of systematic reviews data analysis traditional Chinese medicine methodology systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献148

  • 1陈耀龙,艾昌林,李幼平.“循证”冠名的医学期刊比较研究[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(4):289-295. 被引量:8
  • 2Drummond MF,Sculpher MJ,Torrance GW,等.卫生保健项目经济学评估方法.第3版.李士雪,主译.北京:人民卫生出版社.2008.320. 被引量:2
  • 3Boseley S.News report.The Guardian,June 24,1998. 被引量:1
  • 4Mike Wilson.Evidence-Based Medicine:would you rather read 5 0000 articles or 120? Based Med,2006,11:40. 被引量:1
  • 5McKibbon KA,Wilczynski NL,Haynes RB.What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals? BMC Med,2004,2:33. 被引量:1
  • 6Sackett DL,Haynes RB.13 steps,100 people,and 1 000 000 thanks[Editorial].ACP J Club,1997,127:A14. 被引量:1
  • 7Trisha Greenhalgh.How to Read a Paper:The Basics of Evidence Based Medicine.3 edition.2006.114-134. 被引量:1
  • 8Unknown.Available from http://www.systematic-reviews.com.Available.Accessed on 2009-3-15. 被引量:1
  • 9Unknown.Available from http://www.unitedbiosource.comhttp://www.systematic-reviews.com.Accessed on 2009-3-15. 被引量:1
  • 10Becker LA,Oxman AD.Chapter 22:Overviews of reviews.In:Higgins JPT,Green S(editors).Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Version 5.0.1[updated September 2008].The Cochrane Collaboration,2008.Available from www.cochranehandbook.org. 被引量:1

共引文献221

同被引文献188

引证文献8

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部