摘要
有限责任公司股权代持是一个实践多发而法律规制较少的领域,系统的条文规范缺失使得法院在司法实践中至今无法确立一个统一的适用标准.《公司法解释(三)》第24条确定股东资格归属于名义股东,第25条又规定名义股东将登记于自己名下的股权转让,可以参照《物权法》第106条善意取得制度,这种模棱两可的规定导致在确认股东资格归属时,无法得出唯一的答案.另外将股权的人身利益与财产利益相互糅合处理,不仅难以解决股东资格认定与股权归属问题,同时易有条文体系不一致之嫌.股权包含多种权能,可以概括为财产利益和人身利益,出资产生的财产利益归属按照《合同法》予以规制;而对于涉及股东资格的表决权、参与经营管理权等人身性利益交给《公司法》继续完善.
The nominee shareholding of limited liability companies is an area with more practice and less legal regulation,and the lack of the systematic standard norms makes it impossible for the court to establish a unified applicable standard injudicial practice.Article 24 of the Public Judicial Interpretation(Ⅲ)determines that the qualification of shareholders shall be attributed to nominal shareholders,and Article 25 provides that the transfer of shares in the name of the nominal shareholders may be obtained in good faith by reference to Article 106 of the Property Law,which makes it impossible to draw the only answer when determining the attribution of shareholders?qualifications.In addition,with the personal interests of equity and property interests treated in combination,the problems of shareholder qualification and equity ownership are hard to solve,while the provisions system is easy to be questioned as being inconsistent.Equity includes a variety of powers,which can be summarized as property interests and personal interests,and the attribution of property interests arising from capital contributions is regulated in accordance with the Contract Law,while personal interests involving the voting rights of shareholders and the right to participate in management continue to be perfected to the Company Law.
作者
彭月
Peng Yue(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)
出处
《宁波广播电视大学学报》
2020年第3期70-75,共6页
Journal of Ningbo Radio & TV University
关键词
名义股东
实际出资人
代持协议
股东资格
股权归属
Nominal shareholders
Actual investors
Holding agreements
Shareholder qualifications
Equity ownership
