期刊文献+

结对写作模式下的同伴合作和学习者体验研究

Investigating Peer Cooperation in Pair Writing and Learners'Perceptions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 协作写作能够提升学习者写作技巧,提高写作质量和创造多种二语学习机会。本文旨在探究“学术英语写作”课中结对写作的具体合作形式及学习者体验,利用半结构化访谈收集数据,并对访谈数据进行主题性内容分析。研究表明,学习者的结对写作分三个阶段:确定写作思路、分工和汇总、面对面修改润色;多数学习者在结对写作过程中获得了积极的学习体验。影响学习者结对写作体验的因素主要有同伴态度、同伴二语水平和教师指导方式。本研究对于如何促进外语协作写作,尤其是结对写作,有一定参考价值。 Collaborative writing may enhance learners’writing skills,improve the quality of writing and create various second language learning opportunities.This study investigated learners'collaborative activities while they were engaged in writing in pairs in the course Academic English Writing and these learners'perceptions.Semistructured interviews were employed to collect data,which were analyzed thematically.This study revealed that these learners’pair writing had three phases:discussing and deciding a general writing outline,writing separately and then combining,collecting and polishing together.Most learners had positive experience and perceptions while writing in pairs.Three factors influenced learners'perceptions of pair writing,including peers'attitudes,peers'L2 competence,and the teacher's instruction.This study can shed light on the use of collaborative writing,especially pair writing in foreign language teaching contexts in China.
作者 陈亚琼 张庆华 CHEN Ya-qiong;ZHANG Qing-hua(School of Foreign Languages,China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083)
出处 《牡丹江大学学报》 2020年第9期117-120,共4页 Journal of Mudanjiang University
基金 全国高校外语教学科研项目“英语经典作品自主阅读模式下的学生阅读身份认同研究”(2018BJ0023A) 中国地质大学(北京)2020年度本科教育质量提升计划建设项目(HHSKE202013)的阶段性成果。
关键词 协作写作 结对写作 学习者体验 同伴合作 collaborative writing pair writing learners'perceptions peer cooperation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献47

  • 1周炳兰,刘晓琼.教师在计算机辅助英语写作中的十种角色[J].外语电化教学,2005(1):65-69. 被引量:58
  • 2蒋宇红.在线同伴评价在写作能力发展中的作用[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(3):226-230. 被引量:122
  • 3[1]Brown, A.L. & Palinscar. A. S. Guide, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition[A]. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),Knowing. Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser[C]. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989. 被引量:1
  • 4[2]Burnett. R,E. Characterizing conflict in collaborative relationship: the nature of decision-making during coauthoring [A]. In C. Thralles & N. Blyer (Eds.). The Social Perspective in Professional Communication [C]. Newbury Park. CA: Sage. 1992:144-162. 被引量:1
  • 5[3]Collins. A.. Brown. J. & Newman. S. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics[A]. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing. Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser[C]. Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 1989. 被引量:1
  • 6[4]Daiute.C.& Dalton. B. Let's brighten it up a bit: Collaboration and cognition in writing[A]. In B. A. Rafoth and D.L. Rubin (Eds). The Social Construction of Written Communication [C]. Norwood. NJ: Ablex. 1988:249-269. 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Damon. W. Peer education: The untapped potential[J]. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1984(5) :331-343. 被引量:1
  • 8[6]Deering. P. D.An ethnographic study of the social participation structure of cooperative learning in a multiethnic middle school[D]. Chicago. IL:Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. 1991. 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Ede. L.& Lunsford. A. Why write ...together? [J]. Rhetoric Review. 1983.1(2) :159-157. 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Ede. L.& Lunsford. A. Let them write... together[J]. English Quarterly. 1985.18(4):119-127. 被引量:1

共引文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部