期刊文献+

CYP2C19多态性和P2Y12抑制剂对急性冠状动脉综合征患者远期预后的影响 被引量:2

Effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism and different P2Y12 inhibitors on the long-term prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndromes
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨携带和未携带CYP2C19功能缺陷基因的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者选择不同P2Y12抑制剂与其远期预后的相关性。方法连续入选2016年3月至2016年10月于天津市第三中心医院接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ACS患者289例,进行CYP2C19基因多态性检测,分为携带CYP2C19功能缺陷基因组(A组,199例)和未携带CYP2C19功能缺陷基因组(B组,90例)。PCI术后选择不同的P2Y12抑制剂,随访3年,失访23例,最终A组入组182例,B组入组84例。根据随访3年内有无主要心血管不良事件(MACE),将A、B组各分为MACE亚组(58例、32例)和无MACE亚组(124例、52例)。收集患者的临床资料、冠状动脉病变与介入情况以及术后药物治疗方案,对A、B组内两亚组进行单因素分析,将差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)的危险因素入选,再分别对A、B组进行多因素Logistic回归分析,比较不同P2Y12抑制剂对两组患者预后的影响。结果A组中两亚组间比较,血小板体积、空腹血糖、血肌酐、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、左心室舒张末期内径、单支病变比例、干预左主干病变比例及双联抗血小板治疗方案差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);B组中两亚组间比较,低密度脂蛋白、射血分数、左心室舒张末期内径、双支病变、三支病变比例及术中使用替罗非班比例差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,在A组患者中,不同的P2Y12抑制剂是影响其远期预后的独立危险因素,与替格瑞洛方案相比,氯吡格雷75 mg/d方案患者远期MACE的发生风险是其12.971倍(OR=12.971,95%CI:5.028~33.464,P<0.001),氯吡格雷100 mg/d方案患者远期MACE的发生风险是其6.029倍(OR=6.029,95%CI:2.278~15.958,P<0.001);在B组患者中,不同的P2Y12抑制剂与其远期预后无明显相关性(P>0.05)。结论携带CYP2C19功能缺陷基因的ACS患者PCI术后选择不同的P2Y12抑制剂与其远期MACE相关,且采用替格瑞洛方案� Objective To explore the relationship between the selection of different P2Y12 inhibitors and the long-term prognosis of acute coronary syndrome(ACS)patients with and without CYP2C19 defect gene.Method 289 consecutive ACS patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)at Tianjin Third Central Hospital from March 2016 to October 2016 were selected for CYP2C19 gene polymorphism detection.According to the detection results,the patients were divided into group A(with CYP2C19 loss-of-function gene,199 cases)and group B(without CYP2C19 loss-of-function gene,90 cases).After PCI,different P2Y12 inhibitors were selected.The patients were followed up for 3 years,and 23 cases were lost to follow-up.Finally,182 cases were enrolled in group A and 84 cases were enrolled in group B.According to whether there were major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE)within 3 years,the patients in groups A and B were divided into MACE subgroups(58 cases,32 cases)and non-MACE subgroups(124 cases,52 cases).The single factor analysis of the two subgroups in groups A and B was carried out based on the patient's clinical data,coronary artery disease and intervention status,and postoperative drug treatment plan.Risk factors with statistical significance(P<0.05)were selected,and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on groups A and B to compare the effects of different P2Y12 inhibitors on the prognosis of the two groups.Results The differences in platelet volume,fasting blood glucose,HbA1c,left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,proportion of single-branch lesions,proportion of intervention for left main lesions,and dual antiplatelet therapy were statistically significant between the two subgroups in group A(all P<0.05).The differences in low-density lipoprotein(LDL),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,proportion of two-branch lesions,proportion of three-branch lesions,and proportion of using tirofeben were statistically significant between the two subgroups in group B(al
作者 王赟赟 李彤 刘迎午 刘博江 赵杰 赖朝辉 苏斌 赵云 王昭 Wang Yunyun;Li Tong;Liu Yingwu;Liu Bojiang;Zhao Jie;Lai Chaohui;Su Bin;Zhao Yun;Wang Zhao(Heart Center of Tianjin Third Central Hospital,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases,Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center,Tianjin 300170,China)
出处 《国际生物医学工程杂志》 CAS 2020年第3期207-214,共8页 International Journal of Biomedical Engineering
基金 天津市自然科学基金(19JCYBJC2600)。
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 血小板聚集抑制剂 CYP2C19基因多态性 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 主要心血管不良事件 Coronary artery disease Platelet aggregation inhibitors CYP2C19 gene polymorphism Percutaneous coronary intervention Major adverse cardiovascular events
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献52

  • 1Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC guide- lines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2016, 37 (3): 267-315. 被引量:1
  • 2Nabi F, Chang SM, Xu J, et al. Assessing risk in acute chest pain: the value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients admitted through the emergency department[J]. J Nucl Cardiol, 2012, 19 (2): 233-243. 被引量:1
  • 3Shah BN, Balaji G, Alhajiri A, et al. Incremental dia- gnostic and prognostic value of contemporary stress echocardiography in a chest pain unit: mortality and morbidity outcomes from a real-world setting [J]. Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6 (2): 202-209. 被引量:1
  • 4Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized, controlled trials [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013,61(8):880-892. 被引量:1
  • 5Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, et al. Muhicenter evaluation of a 0-hour / 1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2016, pii: S0196-0644 (15) 01501-01502. 被引量:1
  • 6Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2012, 172 (16): 1211-1218. 被引量:1
  • 7Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation [J]. Eur Heart J, 2012, 33 (20): 2569-2619. 被引量:1
  • 8Fox KA, Fitzgerald G, Puymirat E, et al. Should pa- tients with acute coronary disease be stratified for management according to their risk derivation, external validation and outcomes using the updated GRACE risk score[J]. BMJ Open, 2014, 4 (2): e4425. 被引量:1
  • 9Abu-Assi E, Raposeiras-Roubin S, Lear P, et al. Comparing the predictive validity of three contemporary bleeding risk scores in acute coronary syndrome [J]. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care, 2012, 1 (3): 222- 231. 被引量:1
  • 10Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361 (11): 1045- 1057. 被引量:1

共引文献218

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部