摘要
中国家兔起源问题扑朔迷离,"欧源论"与"本土论"互鸣其高。"中国本兔"和"喜马拉雅兔"长期以来一直被视为我国古代劳动人民培养出来的土生土长的家兔品种,并被视为我国也是家兔起源地的"活证据"。作者认为,中国确实是除欧洲之外的另一个家兔起源中心,"喜马拉雅兔"也确实是中国本土培育出来的家兔品种,但"中国本兔"则不是。文章依据前人没有留意过的材料,得出结论:所谓"中国本兔"是在1636年前后才从南海诸国舶来的亚源兔,并非原产我国。这一史实能够给我们带来重要的启示。
The problem of the origin of the Chinese Rabbit is whirling and complicated,Europe originated theory and native originated theory are two major basic concepts on this problem."The Chinese Native Rabbit"and"the Himalayan Rabbit"are generally regarded as the rabbits farming by the ancient people in China,and are often looked as the evidence that our country is another rabbit origin center besides Europe.The author believes that China is indeed one of the rabbit origin centers in the world,and"the Himalaya Rabbit"is indeed farming by the Chinese people,but"the Chinese Native Rabbit"is not.According to the data the formers have not paid attention to,the writer draws the conclusion:the so-called"the Chinese Native Rabbit"was imported from the countries in the South China Sea in about 1636,and is not native to China.This fact can give us important enlightenments.
作者
苏成爱
SU Cheng-ai(Institute of History&Culture,Anhui University of Finance&Economics,Bengbu 233030)
出处
《中国农史》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期26-33,共8页
Agricultural History of China
关键词
“中国本兔”
名实考辨
中国家兔起源
"the Chinese Native Rabbit"
the differentiation of the name and the reality
the origin of the Chinese rabbit
