摘要
已故明史专家顾诚《李岩质疑》一文认为杞县本无李岩其人,关于李岩活动的记述,都是地主阶级的文人编造出来的。但根据李自成进北京后当时人的各种记载,确有李岩其人。从李自成进北京至逃离,李岩均在北京。李岩谏李自成营救天启张皇后诸事,皆有所本,并非虚构。关于李岩的籍贯,最近在河南博爱县发现《李氏家谱》记载,博爱县唐村人李茂春第四子李信字岩,生于万历三十四年(1606),科考贡生。叔父李春玉字精白,以李信为嗣。崇祯十三年(1640)李岩与堂弟李沐参加了农民军,崇祯十七年同被李自成冤杀,年三十九。由于李岩在杞县粮行经商,其父李春玉字精白,故误传为明兵部尚书李精白。顾诚认为明兵部尚书李精白无李岩其子,从而否定有李岩其人,造成了对历史事实的误判。
In the paper“A Query against Li Yan”,the author Gu Cheng insists that there did not exist a man named Li Yan in County of Qi,and the narrations of his deeds were all fictitious.Yet there was indeed such a person according to various records by people of the time,and he had always been in Beijing during Li Zicheng's occupation,and matters such as Li Yan expostulating with Li Zicheng about rescuing Queen Zhang of Emperor Xizong of Ming are all well-founded.About Li's native place,it is recorded in Li's Family Tree recently discovered in Bo'ai County,Henan Province that,Li Yan,the fourth son of villager Li Maochun of Tang Village,was a tribute student born in A.D.1606.His uncle Li Chunyu styled Jingbai took Li Yan as his heir.In 1640,Li Yan attended the peasant army with his cousin Li Mu,and was killed wrongly by Li Zicheng four years later.Li's father was misinformed to be the Minister of War Li Jingbai for the same style.Gu Cheng denied the existence of Li Yan as the Minister did not have a son named Li Yan,thus caused misjudgement about the historical fact.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第5期71-85,166,共16页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
