期刊文献+

构建服务于师生共同发展的评价体系——美国威斯康星州“教育者效能系统”教师评价实践及其启示

Construction of Evaluation System for Teachers and Students Mutual Development:The Teacher Evaluation Practice of Wisconsin EducatorEffectiveness System in America and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教师是影响学生学习与发展的最重要因素。在以学生成绩为标准的问责制实施背景下,近年来美国教师评价从重视教师先在特征转向重视教师具体教学行为对学生学习结果的实际效应。教育者效能系统是美国威斯康星州公共教育部2011年出台的学校教师和管理者表现评价制度。该系统以促进教师和学生发展为理念,采取定量与定性多元评价方法,坚持评、教、学一体化的实践逻辑,以求达到以评促教、以评促学的实践效果。这在一定程度上弥补了传统单纯基于观察的教师评价模式弊端,对我国现代教师评价制度改革具有一定的启示意义。 Teachers are the most important factor that affects students'learning and development.In the context of the implementation of the accountability system based on student achievement,teacher evaluation in the United States has changed from paying attention to teachers'innate characteristics to the actual effect of teachers'specific teaching behaviors on students'learning results in recent years.Educator Effectiveness System,introduced by the Wisconsin Department of Public Education in 2011,is a school teacher and principal performance evaluation system.In order to achieve the practical effect of promoting learning and teaching through evaluation,the system takes the development of teachers and students as its priority,adopts quantitative and qualitative multiple evaluation methods and adheres to the practical logic of integration of evaluation,teaching and learning.To a certain extent,it makes up for the shortcomings of the traditional simply observation-based teacher evaluation model,which has a certain enlightenment to teacher evaluation reform in China.
作者 黄建辉 周路遥 HUANG Jian-hui;ZHOU Lu-yao(School of Education,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)
出处 《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》 2020年第4期5-12,共8页 Journal of Jimei University:Education Science Edition
基金 江西省教育科学规划课题“融合教育视域下特殊教育教师关键胜任力构成与提升路径研究”(18YB032) 江西省高等学校教学改革研究项目“基于教育公共治理视域下的普通高校本科专业综合评估发展研究”(JXJG-16-2-13)。
关键词 教育者效能系统 教师评价 威斯康星州 Educator Effectiveness System teacher evaluation Wisconsin
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献29

  • 1CCSSO’s Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards and Learning Progres-sions for Teachers1.0[EB/OL].http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2013/2013 _INTASC_Learning_Progressions_for_Teachers.pdf,2014. 被引量:1
  • 2Heritage M. Learning Progressions:Supporting Instruction and Formative Assessment[EB/OL].ht-tp://www.docin.com/p-388517721.html,2014. 被引量:1
  • 3邵光华.教师专业知识发展研究[M]杭州:浙江大学出版社,2011200. 被引量:1
  • 4泰勒;施良方.课程与教学的基本原理[M]北京:人民教育出版社,199423. 被引量:1
  • 5Jonas F. Solti. (ed.). Reforming Teacher Education : The Impact of the Holmes Group Report[C]. New York : Teach- ers College Press.1987. 被引量:1
  • 6National Board for Professional Teaching Standards:What Teachers Should Know and Be Able to Do [EB/OL]. http: //www.nbpts.org/five-core-propositions.2015-05-12. 被引量:1
  • 7Stephen Sawchuk. New Studies Affirm hnpact of Board- Certified Teachers [J]. Education Week, 2015,34( 26 ) : 6. 被引量:1
  • 8D. A. Sousa. The Leadership Brain:How to Lead Today's Schools More Effectively [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. Cited from Hoewook Chung & Hyunjin Kim. hn- plementing Professional Standards in Teacher Preparation Programs in the United States:Preservice Teachers' Under- standing of Teaching Standards [J]. KEDI Journal of Edu- cational Policy, 2010,7(2) : 355-377. 被引量:1
  • 9Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. CAEP Becomes Sole Specialized Accreditor for Educator Prepara- tion [EB/OL]. http ://caepnet.org/2013/07/01/caep-hecomes- sole - specialized - accredi - tor- for- educator- preparation/. 2015-05-12. 被引量:1
  • 10Council of Chief State School Officers. InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards and Learning Progressions for Teachers 1.0 [EB/OL]. http ://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Publications/ InTASC_Model_Core_Teaching_Standards and Learning_ Progressions for Teachers_ 10.html.2015 -05-12. 被引量:1

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部